The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
spirit is the pleasure in such sounds as the call of the curlew, the
boom of the bittern, the chattering of magpies, the caw of rooks, the
piping of quails, the scream of jays, the clang of seamews, the shrill
clamor of cranes, the shriek of the gull, the whistle of plovers, the
whir of the partridge. To hear such sounds the poet must wander over
moors, by sedgy lakes, along rough shores, far enough from trim parks.
To bring such sounds into poetry marked a great revolution in taste
from the days of the lorn nightingale and the plaintive turtle. As a
whole we may say that the treatment of sound in eighteenth-century
poetry is abundant, accurate, and often very effective.
The process of passing from general to specific statements as a result
of increased knowledge shows itself again in the use of color. The
universal paint of the classical school has been resolved into some of
its constituent elements. These are not many, however, and there is not
much nice discrimination into shades and tints. The colors most often
observed are green, blue, yellow or gold, purple, red or crimson, and
brown, the order given being the order of their frequency. Purple is
used less frequently than in the classical poetry and usually has some
real artistic significance. Yellow, a comparatively new word, is used
often of harvests, of trees in autumn, of moonlight, and of various
sunlight effects. Dyer gave early prominence to the word as an epithet
applied to Nature. Brown is applied in somewhat the conventional manner
to streams and shadows. Thomson, Dyer, Savage, and Cowper made the
most effective use of color, and it is important to observe that their
advance consisted not so much in seeing many more colors than had
been seen before, as in discovering color in many more objects than
formerly. They did not merely see that “all above is blue and all below
is green.” They saw the blue heavens, but they saw, too, the blue of
“sky dyed plumbs,” of mists, of distant hills, of streams and bays, of
ice-films, of the halcyon’s wing, of curling smoke, of the lightning
flash. The endive, the lavender, the lilac, the violet, the harebell,
the heath-flower, are singled out as blue. And Dyer speaks of the blue
color of the poplars, and Dalton of blue slate roofs. Not merely the
general green of a summer landscape is commented upon, but there are
closer observations concerning the varying shades of green as the trees
are massed together. The russet tints brought out in green tree tops at
sunset, the funereal green of yews, the yellow-green in a sunset sky,
the yellow tinge in green grass almost ready for the scythe, the glossy
green of the holly, the deep green of box, the contrasting green of
elm, oak, and maple, are some typical observations.
The use of color, however, seems, on the whole, in spite of its
abundance and picturesqueness, hardly so varied and individual as the
use of sound.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account