The Trial and Conviction of That Infamous Hypocrite John Church: The Surrey Tabernacle Preacher, Borough-road, St. George's Fields, for an Abominable Offence; Including the Whole of the Evidence; Tried Before Lord Ellenborough, at the Surrey Assizes, Croydon, Saturday, August 16, 1817. To Which Is Added, His Life, Confessions, Notes of One of His Sermons, the Whole of the Love-letters, &c. &c.Anonymous
Religion
The Trial and Conviction of That Infamous Hypocrite John Church: The Surrey Tabernacle Preacher, Borough-road, St. George's Fields, for an Abominable Offence; Including the Whole of the Evidence; Tried Before Lord Ellenborough, at the Surrey Assizes, Croydon, Saturday, August 16, 1817. To Which Is Added, His Life, Confessions, Notes of One of His Sermons, the Whole of the Love-letters, &c. &c.
Anonymous
Church, J. (John), approximately 1780-approximately 1825 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Sodomy) -- England
copy. Witness did not read that copy of the letter to Church; he had.
not the copy at that time; only told him he wished to know what the three
things were which he could deny, as asserted by the boy; does not
recollect the third point; it is not material. He admitted being in the
room, but denied the laying hold,—he said, “I was in the room; but I did
not lay hold of the boy.” Did not say why he was in the room. Witness
returned the letter of the 6th of October to Mrs. Hunter. He got it from
Mrs. Hunter, and to Mrs. Hunter he returned it.
_Cross-examined by Mr. Gurney_.—Meant to say that Church said distinctly
to witness that he was in the room. Did not mention to any person, after
he had see Mr. Church, that he was not implicated in the affair at all.
Never said any such thing. Did not give any person an account of the
conversation you had with him, and accompany that account with this
observation, “He is not at all implicated.” Mr. Thomas went to the door
of Mr. Church with witness. Thomas is no friend of witness’s; witness
had only seen him at the door. It was _his_ wife and witness’s that
wished witness to make the application to Mr. Church. Mr. Thomas went
with him as far as the door, but did not go in with him. Witness told
him briefly what had transpired; it was very short what did transpire.
He told Mr. Thomas what had transpired at the interview with Mr. Church,
when he came out. Think he told Mr. Thomas that Mr. Church admitted
having been in the room, but is not positive as to that point; knows he
told him that Mr. Church said he did not lay hold of the boy. Did not
answer, on Mr. Thomas asking, “Well, is there any thing against Mr.
Church, or not.”—“No; he is not at all implicated.” Never told him,
directly or indirectly, that there was nothing to implicate Mr. Church.
Witness did say he would prosecute Mr. Church because he had said
disgraceful things of witness’s wife, but not for this crime, but for
defamation of his wife’s character. Don’t know that he ever told Mr.
Thomas so, but believes he said that, or words to that effect, to other
persons. Did not mention that, amongst other things, on that very
morning that he had the interview with Mr. Church; some other time he
might.
MRS. HUNTER _sworn_.
_Examined by Mr. Marryatt_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account