The Trial and Death of Jesus Christ: A Devotional History of Our Lord's PassionStalker, James
Religion
The Trial and Death of Jesus Christ: A Devotional History of Our Lord's Passion
Stalker, James
Jesus Christ -- Crucifixion; Jesus Christ -- Trial
The reply was a characteristic one, "If He were not a malefactor, we
would not have delivered Him up unto thee." This was as broad a hint
as they could give that they desired the governor to waive his right to
re-try the case, accepting their trial of it as sufficient, and content
himself with the other half of his prerogative--the passing and the
execution of the sentence. Sometimes provincial governors did so,
either through indolence or out of compliment to the native
authorities; and especially in a religious cause, which a foreigner
could not be expected to understand, such a compliment might seem a
boon which it was not unreasonable to ask.
But Pilate was not in a yielding mood, and retorted, "Take ye Him and
judge Him according to your law." This was as much as to say: If I am
not to hear the case, then I will neither pass the sentence nor inflict
the punishment; if you insist on this being a case for yourselves as
ecclesiastics, then keep it to yourselves; but, if you do, you must be
content with such a punishment as the law permits you to inflict.
To them this was gall and wormwood, because it was for the life of
Christ they were thirsting, and they well knew that imprisonment or
beating with rods was as far as they could go. The cold, keen Roman,
as proud as themselves, was making them feel the pressure of Rome's
foot on their neck, and he enjoyed a malicious pleasure in extorting
from them the complaint, "It is not lawful for us to put any man to
death."
Forced against their will and their expectation to formulate a charge,
they began to pour forth many vehement accusations; out of which at
length three emerged with some distinctness--first, that He was
perverting the nation; second, that He forbade to pay the imperial
tribute; and third, that He set Himself up as a king.
It will be observed that they never mentioned the charge on which they
had condemned Him themselves. It was for none of these three things
that they had condemned Him, but for blasphemy. They knew too well,
however, that if they advanced such a charge in this place, the
likelihood was that it would be sneered out of court. It will be
remembered how a Roman governor, mentioned in the life of St. Paul,
dealt with such a charge: "Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a
matter of wrong or wicked lewdness, O ye Jews, reason would that I
should bear with you; but, if it be a question of words and names, and
of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters.
And he drave them from the judgment-seat." [3] And, although of course
Pilate could not have dared to exhibit the same cynical disdain for
what he would have called Jewish superstition, yet they knew that it
was in his heart.
But their inability to bring forward the real charge put them in a
false position, the dangers of which they did not escape. They had to
extemporise crimes, and they were not scrupulous about it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account