The Trial and Execution, for Petit Treason, of Mark and Phillis, Slaves of Capt. John Codman: Who Murdered Their Master at Charlestown, Mass., in 1755; for Which the Man Was Hanged and Gibbeted, and the Woman Was Burned to Death. Including, Also, Some Account of Other Punishments by Burning in MassachusettsGoodell, Abner Cheney
History
The Trial and Execution, for Petit Treason, of Mark and Phillis, Slaves of Capt. John Codman: Who Murdered Their Master at Charlestown, Mass., in 1755; for Which the Man Was Hanged and Gibbeted, and the Woman Was Burned to Death. Including, Also, Some Account of Other Punishments by Burning in Massachusetts
"Jack negro servant to Mr Samuel Woolcot of
Weathersfield thou art Jndicted by the name of Jack Negro
for not hauing the feare of God before thy eyes being
Instigated by the Divill did at or upon the foureteenth day
of July last 1681 wittingly & felloniously sett on fier
Leiftenat Wm Clarks house in North Hampton. by taking
a brand of fier from the hearth and swinging it vp & doune
for to find victualls as by his confession may Appeare
Contrary to the peace of our Soueraigne Lord the King his
Croune & dignity the lawes of God & of this Jurisdiction in
that case made & prouided title firing of houses page (52)
to wch Jndictment at the barr he pleaded not Guilty, &
Affirmd he would be trjed by God & the Country and after his
Confessions &c were read to him & his owni[=g] thereof were
Comitted to the Jury who brought him in Guilty and the
next day had his sentence pronounct agt him by the
Gouernor that he should goe from the barr to the place
whence he came & there be hangd by the neck till he be
dead & then taken doune & burnt to Ashes in the fier wth
Marja Negro--The Lord be mercifull to thy soule sajd the
Gouernor"[23]
[Footnote 23: _Ibid._]
There was some excuse for the latter part of this sentence, for since
the offence was an atrocious felony, such as in England would subject
the offender to an infamous punishment, it seemed proper to attach
something more of ignominy to his sentence than the mere execution by
hanging.
Our forefathers of the colonial period regarded the Mosaic law as of
too sacred obligation to be impaired in the least degree; much more to
be expressly contravened by the courts of justice in respect to the
command,--
"And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he
be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree, his body
shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in
any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is
accursed of God;) that thy land be not defiled, which the
Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance."[24]
[Footnote 24: Deut. xxi. 22, 23.]
--they, therefore, by an ordinance passed in 1641, had required that
the body of every executed criminal should be buried within twelve
hours after death, except in cases of anatomy, which prevented the
possibility of hanging in chains after the English fashion; and the
only way in which they could set a mark of infamy upon the deceased
criminal, without a breach of the colonial ordinance as well as of the
divine law, was to burn the body.[25]
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account