As for the charge of forgery brought against Colonel Picquart, it has been completely abandoned, for, although there were some insinuations to that effect in Major Ravary’s report, Colonel Picquart recently appeared before a council of inquiry, and among the things with which he was reproached there was not the slightest allusion to the possibility of a forgery in the case of the document in question.” The Judge.--“What do you know about it?” M. Leblois.--“_Monsieur le Président_, I know it in the most certain and natural way, because I was myself a witness before the council of inquiry.” The Judge.--“Were you there throughout the hearing?” M. Leblois.--“No, but I have knowledge of the facts with which the colonel was reproached.” The Judge.--“You say that you have knowledge of them, but you do not know them of your own knowledge, since you were not there.” M. Labori.--“Permit me to observe, _Monsieur le Président_, that the witnesses should have the advantage of the right to give their testimony without being interrupted, according to the terms of Article 315 of the code of criminal examination. I claim this right for M. Leblois. As to the fact which he affirms, the question is not how he knows it, but whether it is true.” The Judge.--“Permit me, Maître Labori; I suppose that the court is entitled to question witnesses.” M. Labori.--“It is not entitled to interrupt them.” The Judge.--“I did not interrupt M. Leblois. I asked him for indications on a point which it is necessary to throw light upon. I will continue to do so, rest assured.” M. Labori.--“I do not pretend to discuss with you the duties of the judge of the assize court. You know them better than I do. I add that I am ready to render homage to the great impartiality with which you endeavor to direct the debate. But, on the other hand, this is a matter in which it is impossible for us to part with the smallest particle of our rights. They deprive us here of all the faculties that they can deprive us of. We are here face to face with testimony which is entitled to be heard; we ask that it shall be heard freely and independently. Now, Article 315 of the code of criminal examination authorizes witnesses to give their testimony without interruption, without prejudice to the right of the court to ask them, after their deposition, whatsoever questions it sees fit.” The Judge.--“That is what I have just done.” M. Labori.--“The deposition of M. Leblois is not finished. He was in the course of it when you interrupted him.” The Judge.--“Pardon, M. Leblois had finished. I asked him a question to throw light upon his deposition.” M. Leblois.--“I will answer you in the clearest fashion. In the first place, I declare that I know that Colonel Picquart was asked but four questions. As to the source of this knowledge, I do not think that I am bound to give it, and for a good reason; I am Colonel Picquart’s lawyer.” The Judge.--“You should have said so at the beginning.”