M. Labori.--“It _is_ always the same question, and I understand why you are always ready to welcome it in the same manner.” The Judge.--“M. Scheurer-Kestner, you are to tell us of Major Esterhazy, but I beg you not to say anything of the Dreyfus case, concerning which we will not hear a word. Tell us of the Esterhazy case, but not of the Dreyfus case.” M. Scheurer-Kestner.--“I note what you say, _Monsieur le Président_. Last July I learned that, at the office of the general staff, in the bureau of information, in September, 1896, Colonel Picquart, who was then a major and the chief of this bureau, had discovered, in the course of investigations undertaken _à propos_ of other matters, but relating to Major Esterhazy, that there had been a mistake in 1894 in attributing the _bordereau_ to M. Alfred Dreyfus. I learned at the same time that, as soon as Colonel Picquart had made his discovery, he made haste to consult M. Bertillon, who had been one of the experts consulted in 1894, and who, without any hesitation, had attributed the _bordereau_ to Alfred Dreyfus. Colonel Picquart, showing him the _bordereau_ and Major Esterhazy’s handwriting, but without telling him whose handwriting it was, asked him what he thought of it, and M. Bertillon said to him: ‘Ah! the forgers have succeeded. It is no similarity; it is identity.’ Colonel Picquart came back with this reply, and asked his chief to continue an investigation in this direction. He proposed to General Gonse, among others, to submit the documents to a new expert examination, and General Gonse dissuaded him. There is in existence a correspondence which was then exchanged between General Gonse and Colonel Picquart. I took pains to become acquainted with this correspondence, for it was of great value to me, being of a nature to settle my opinion. The correspondence being communicated to me, I was convinced by reading it that General Gonse accepted the opinion of Colonel Picquart, who was paving the way for a revision of the trial. It seems to me indispensable, in order to enlighten the jurors, that I should read this correspondence to them.” The Judge.--“No, that is not possible.” M. Labori.--“We must have the light, and I consider it indispensable that these letters should be put in evidence.” The Judge.--“The law requires that witnesses shall testify without the aid of any document. However, if the attorney-general is not opposed to it, I shall not oppose it.” The Attorney-General.--“General Gonse and Lieutenant-Colonel Picquart have been summoned. They will testify concerning the letters, if they see fit.” M. Labori.--“I suggest that M. Scheurer-Kestner be authorized to hand the letters to the court.” The Attorney-General.--“It is not possible. The government should have been notified of them at the proper time.”