The question again arises: If the full Sanhedrin was present at the
morning session and if all the members condemned Jesus, either with or
without a formal verdict, is it not true that both Nicodemus and Joseph
of Arimathea, who were doubtless members of the court, were arrayed
against the Christ? If they were hostile in their attitude toward Him,
either openly or by acquiescence at the morning session, does this fact
not help to support the contention made under Point IX that they voted
against Him at the night trial? We are well aware that there is much
opposition to this view, but we are, nevertheless, compelled to agree
rather reluctantly with Keim that "it is a pure supposition that members
of the council who were secret friends of Jesus--whose existence,
moreover, cannot be established--either raised an opposition in one of
the sessions, or abstained from voting, or were not present."[352] The
plain language of the Scriptures indicates: (1) That both Nicodemus[353]
and Joseph of Arimathea[354] were members of the Great Sanhedrin; (2)
that they were both present at both trials;[355] and (3) that they both
either voted against Him or tacitly acquiesced in the judgments
pronounced against Him.[356] We have already discussed under Point IX
the passage in Luke xxiii. 51 referring to the fact that Joseph of
Arimathea "had not consented to the counsel and deed of them," which
seems to furnish refutation of the contention which we have made, as far
as such contention relates to Joseph of Arimathea. Suffice it to note
the opinion of Keim that "the passage in itself can be held to refer to
absence or to dissent in voting."[357]
"And the whole multitude of them arose, and led him unto Pilate."
The reader may ask: Why did the Jews lead Jesus away to Pilate? When
they had condemned Him to death on the charge of blasphemy, why did they
themselves not put Him to death? Why did they invoke Roman interference
in the matter? Why did they not stone Jesus to death, as Hebrew law
required in the case of culprits convicted of blasphemy? Stephen was
stoned to death for blasphemy.[358] What was the difference between his
case and that of Jesus? Why was Jesus crucified instead of being put to
death by stoning?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account