The stoning of Stephen as a blasphemer by the Jews has been explained as
an irregular outbreak of fanatical priests, a sort of mob violence. It
has also been contended that the case of Stephen was one of the rare
instances in which Roman procurators permitted the Jews to execute the
death sentence. In any event it was an exceptional proceeding. At the
time of the crucifixion of Jesus and of the martyrdom of Stephen the
Jews had lost the right of enforcing the death penalty. Judea was a
subject province of the Roman empire. The Jews were permitted by the
Romans to try capital cases. If an acquittal was the result, the Romans
did not interfere. If a verdict of guilty was found, the Jews were
compelled to lead the prisoner away to the Roman governor, who reviewed
or retried the case as he saw fit. Accordingly, having condemned Him to
death themselves, the Jews were compelled to lead Jesus away to the
palace of Herod on the hill of Zion in which Pilate was stopping on the
occasion of the Paschal Feast, to see what he had to say about the
matter, whether he would reverse or affirm the sentence which they had
pronounced.
The Roman trial of Jesus will be treated in the second volume of this
work.
END OF VOL. I
FOOTNOTES:
[1] "Testimony of the Evangelists," pp. 7-11.
[2] "Testimony of the Evangelists," pp. 25, 26.
[3] I "Starkie on Evidence," pp. 480-545.
[4] John x. 30: "I and my Father are one."
[5] Matt. ix. 9.
[6] Col. iv. 14: "Luke, the beloved physician."
[7] Matt. xxvi. 70-72.
[8] Matt. xxvi. 46-50.
[9] Matt. xxvi. 56.
[10] Matt. xiv. 28-31.
[11] Mark x. 35-42; Matt. xx. 20-25.
[12] Matt. xi. 2, 3.
[13] Mark iii. 21.
[14] Luke iv. 28, 29.
[15] Mark xiv. 51, 52.
[16] "Intro. Vie de Jesus."
[17] Luke i. 2, 3.
[18] "Die synoptischen Evangelien," pp. 412-14.
[19] Marcus Dods, "The Bible, Its Origin and Nature," p. 184.
[20] An opposite doctrine seems to be taught in Luke xii. 11, 12; xxiv.
48, 49.
[21] "Evidences of Christianity," p. 319.
[22] Matt. xiv. 12-20; Mark vi. 34-43; Luke ix. 12-17; John vi. 5-13.
[23] Luke xxii. 64.
[24] Luke xxii. 51.
[25] Campbell's "Philosophy of Rhetoric," c. v. b. 1, Part III, p. 125.
[26] "Intro. Vie de Jesus," p. 62.
[27] D. L. Moody, "Sermon on the Resurrection of Jesus."
[28] See also I "Starkie on Evidence," pp. 496-99.
[29] "Ant.," XVIII. 3, I.
[30] See authorities cited in "The Brief."
[31] "De iis qui sero puniuntur," p. 554.
[32] P. 1080, edit. 45.
[33] P. 1247, edit. 24, Huds.
[34] P. 1327, edit. 43.
[35] "Productique omnes, virgisque cæsi, ac securi percussi," Lib. XI.
c. 5.
[36] Domit. Cap. X. "Patremfamilias--canibus objecit, cum hoc _titulo_,
Impie locutus, parmularius."
[37] Book LIV.
[38] "Aur. Vict. Ces.," Cap. XLI. "Eo pius, ut etiam vetus veterrimumque
supplicium, patibulum, et cruribus suffringendis, primus removerit."
Also see Paley's "Evidences of Christianity," pp. 266-68.
[39] Luke xxii. 44.
[40] Tissot, "Traité des Nerfs," pp. 279, 280.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account