The Tribune of Nova Scotia: A Chronicle of Joseph HoweGrant, W. L. (William Lawson)
History
The Tribune of Nova Scotia: A Chronicle of Joseph Howe
Grant, W. L. (William Lawson)
Howe, Joseph, 1804-1873
At the American Revolution the revolutionary leaders were, in the main,
men of the people, trained in political arts and eloquence in these
local assemblies; their complaints against the mother country were, in
part at least, against her restrictive colonial system. Hence, after
the winning of American independence, when the mother country
endeavoured to draw lessons from her defeat, it {33} appeared to her
statesmen that the colonies had been lost through too much political
democracy in them and too much economic control by her. Thus after the
Revolution we find a series of favours given to colonial trade. The
timber trade and the shipbuilding of Nova Scotia were aided by bounties
and preferential duties. Her commerce was still largely with Great
Britain, where she purchased manufactured articles, though even here
certain concessions were made; but so important were the favours
considered that not even Howe thought the control a grievance, and when
in 1846-49 Great Britain inaugurated free trade and put the colonies
upon their own feet, Nova Scotians, while not despairing as openly as
did the people of Montreal, yet thought it a very great blow indeed.
While conferring these favours, Great Britain exercised a growing
control over Nova Scotian political affairs. The Assembly, granted in
1758, was indeed retained, but a restraining hand was kept on it by the
Colonial Office in London, through the governor and the Council. An
attempt was made to combine representative and irresponsible
government. The House of Assembly might talk, and raise money, but it
did not control the expenditure, the {34} patronage, or the
administration, and it could neither make nor unmake the ministry. The
more important House was the Council, which consisted of twelve
gentlemen appointed by the king, and holding their offices practically
for life. This body was at once the Upper House of the Legislature,
corresponding to our present Senate, and the Executive or Cabinet. It
was also to a certain extent a judicial body, being the Supreme Court
of Divorce for the province. It sat with closed doors, admitting no
responsibility to the people. Yet no bill could pass but by its
consent. It discharged all the functions of government; all patronage
was vested in it. It might do these things ill; its administration
might be condemned by every one of the representatives of the people;
but its authority remained unaffected.
In this Council sat the heads of departments, as they do in our modern
Cabinet. They were appointed in and by Great Britain, and helped to
control the commercial policy. Another member was the bishop of the
Anglican Church, for the seemly ceremonies and graded orders of clergy
of this body were deemed to be a counterpoise to popular vagaries and
vulgarity. Prior to the American Revolutionary War there had been no
colonial bishopric; {35} three years after its close the first bishop
of Nova Scotia was appointed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account