The Tribune of Nova Scotia: A Chronicle of Joseph Howe — John Shaqi
The Tribune of Nova Scotia: A Chronicle of Joseph HoweGrant, W. L. (William Lawson)
History
The Tribune of Nova Scotia: A Chronicle of Joseph Howe
Grant, W. L. (William Lawson)
Howe, Joseph, 1804-1873
Foiled in his well-meant attempt, Sir John then consulted the Colonial
Office. Into that {88} department a new spirit had come with the arrival
in 1846 of Lord Grey, who replied with a dispatch in which the principles
of Responsible Government were laid down in the clearest terms, while at
the same time the Reformers were warned that only the holders of the
great political offices should be subject to removal, and that there
should be no approach to the 'spoils system,' which was at the time
disgracing the United States. In 1847 the Reformers carried the
province, and Sir John Harvey gave to their leaders his loyal support.
Mr Uniacke was called on to form an administration, in which Howe was
given the post of provincial secretary. There was a final flurry. For a
month or two the province was convulsed by the conduct of the former
provincial secretary, Sir Rupert D. George, who, amid the plaudits of
fashionable Halifax, refused to resign. But Sir Rupert was dismissed
with a pension, and Joe Howe ruled in his stead. The ten years' conflict
was at an end. The printer's boy had faced the embattled oligarchy, and
had won.
It was a bloodless victory. Heart-burning indeed there was, and the
breaking up of friendships. But it is the glory of Howe that
responsibility was won in the Maritime {89} Provinces without rebellion.
In the next year, in his song for the centenary of the landing of the
Britons in Halifax, he exultantly broke out:
The blood of no brother, in civil strife poured,
In this hour of rejoicing encumbers our souls!
The frontier's the field for the patriot's sword,
And cursed is the weapon that faction controls!
In conclusion we must ask ourselves, was it worth while? Was the winning
of Responsible Government a good thing? We are apt to take this for
granted. Too many of our historians write as if all the members of the
Family Compact had been selfish and corrupt, and all our present
statesmen were altruistic and pure. Both propositions are equally
doubtful. A man is not necessarily selfish and corrupt because he is a
Tory, nor altruistic and pure because he calls himself a Liberal or a
Reformer. It is very doubtful whether Nova Scotia is better governed
to-day than it was in the days of Lord Dalhousie or Sir Colin Campbell.
Native Nova Scotians have shown that we do not need to go abroad for lazy
and impecunious placemen. But two things are certain. Nova Scotia is
more contented, if not with its government, at least with the system by
which that government is chosen, {90} and it has within itself the
capacity for self-improvement. Before Joseph Howe Nova Scotians were
under tutors and governors; he won for them the liberty to rise or fall
by their own exertions, and fitted them for the expansion that was to
come.
[1] The full text of this speech will be found in Chisholm, _Speeches and
Letters_, vol. i, p. 144.
[2] Chisholm, _Speeches and Letters_, vol. i, p. 223.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account