The Triumph of the Scarlet PimpernelOrczy, Emmuska Orczy, Baroness
General
The Triumph of the Scarlet Pimpernel
Orczy, Emmuska Orczy, Baroness
Adventure stories; Blakeney, Percy, Sir (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
Inevitably these too perished, one by one, irrespective of their virtues
or their vices, their errors or their ideals: Vergniaud, the enthusiast,
and Desmoulins, the irresponsible; Barnave, the just, and Chaumette, the
blasphemer; Hébert, the carrion, and Danton, the power. All, all have
perished, one after the other: victims of their greed and of their
crimes--they and their adherents and their enemies. They slew and were
slain in their turn. They struck blindly, like raging beasts, most of
them for fear lest they too should be struck by beasts more furious than
they. All have perished; but not before their iniquities have for ever
sullied what might have been the most glorious page in the history of
France--her fight for Liberty. Because of these monsters--and of a truth
there were only a few--the fight, itself sublime in its ideals, noble in
its conception, has become abhorrent to the rest of mankind.
But they, arraigned at the bar of history, what have they to say, what
to show as evidence of their patriotism, the purity of their intentions?
On this day of April, 1794, year II of the New Calendar, eight thousand
men, women, and not a few children, are crowding the prisons of Paris to
overflowing. Four thousand heads have fallen under the guillotine in the
past three months. All the great names of France, her noblesse, her
magistracy, her clergy, members of past Parliaments, shining lights in
the sciences, the arts, the Universities, men of substance, poets,
brain-workers, have been torn from their homes, their churches or their
places of refuge, dragged before a travesty of justice, judged,
condemned and slaughtered; not singly, not individually, but in
batches--whole families, complete hierarchies, entire households; one
lot for the crime of being rich, another for being nobly born; some
because of their religion, others because of professed free-thought. One
man for devotion to his friend, another for perfidy; one for having
spoken, another for having held his tongue, and another for no crime at
all--just because of his family connexions, his profession or his
ancestry.
For months it had been the innocents; but since then it has also been
the assassins. And the populace, still awaiting the Millennium, clamour
for more victims and for more--for the aristocrat and for the
sans-culotte, and howl with execration impartially at both.
§2
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account