The troubadours : $b A history of Provençal life and literature in the middle agesHueffer, Francis
History
The troubadours : $b A history of Provençal life and literature in the middle ages
Hueffer, Francis
Provençal poetry -- History and criticism; Troubadours
The explanatory nature of these prose interludes induces Raynouard
to class Rambaut’s poem with the ‘pièces avec commentaire’ (‘Choix,’
vol. ii. p. 248). To add a kind of commentary to poetic work was a not
uncommon custom in the middle ages. Dante’s ‘Vita Nuova’ is a prominent
case in point. In Provence, where a whole school of poets took pride in
writing as incomprehensibly as might be, some such assistance to the
weaker brethren became all the more indispensable. In most cases no doubt
the joglar supplied the want by adding, after the recital of a poem, such
explanatory notes as might seem most adapted to the intellectual level of
his audience. Of Guillem (not Peter, as Raynouard calls him) de la Tor,
the joglar, and friend of Sordello, we are told in the manuscripts that
‘he knew a great many canzos and was clever and sang well. He also was
a poet; but when he wanted to recite his canzos he made his commentary
longer than the poem itself.’ From the expression used by the biographer,
_sermo de la razo_, we are led to conclude that Guillem’s long-winded
explanations were couched in prose. This, however, was not always the
case. We know of troubadours who good-naturedly took the trouble to
elucidate the darknesses of brother bards by means of poetic glosses.
Guiraut Riquier, the scholar and poet, here again shines by his example.
The nature of these commentaries is well illustrated by a stanza of one
of his poems which the reader will find translated in Raynouard’s ‘Choix’
(ii. 252). Guiraut de Calanson, in one of his poems, speaking of the
palace of love, says that four steps, or degrees, lead up to it. Guiraut
Riquier explains that these steps are ‘honour,’ ‘discretion,’ ‘gentle
service,’ and ‘good sufferance,’ much to the edification, no doubt, of
mediæval readers, and especially of Count Henri de Rodez, who, under his
hand and seal, testifies to Guiraut’s explanation being trustworthy and
to the point. The five portals of the palace and the mode of opening each
individually, also find a circumstantial explanation at Guiraut’s hands.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account