The True Ministers of Christ Accredited by the Holy Spirit: A SermonGell, Philip
Religion
The True Ministers of Christ Accredited by the Holy Spirit: A Sermon
Gell, Philip
Bible. Corinthians, 2nd, II, 17-III, 1-6 -- Sermons; Sermons, English -- 19th century
1. The awful ungodliness of some of us too plainly proves the truth of
this, believe it who will. It is fearful to think of their standing as
they are in the sanctuary of the Most HOLY GOD! “To the wicked GOD
saith, What hast thou to do, to declare my statutes, and to take my
covenant in thy mouth? Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my
words behind thee.” {7}
2. But, alas! It is not only the unholy beyond dispute that may fail of
the HOLY GHOST. What say the habits of vain conversation in many; their
ease and pleasure in worldly occupations and amusements; their constraint
under sacred employments, their gladness when such works are done? Must
_their_ hearts be the temples of the HOLY GHOST? Will He make the word
to be “the power of GOD,” to honour _their_ preaching of it; or the
sacraments means of grace, to own _their_ administration? May He not,
does He not refuse to do so? Where is the fruit of their labour?
3. But even were we questionable in nothing but points of doctrine and
religious practices which we teach, this were enough, not only to raise
the question, whether we minister by the HOLY GHOST, but also to
determine it. For the SPIRIT cannot testify to _both_ of two systems
_differing_ from one another in many fundamental points.
Such are the two systems at present in agitation. That of Protestant
Evangelical Christianity on the one hand, and that of Anglo-catholicity
on the other: the one rejecting Romanism in all its peculiarities; the
other sympathizing with it, and avowedly rejecting the principles of the
Protestant faith. {8a} The controversy is not new, though it has seldom
been so vigorously conducted on either side as now. The same spirits
were in active warfare some forty years ago. {8b} But, in fact, it has
been fairly said by one of the chief writers on the Anglo-catholic side,
that there have ever been these two principal parties in the Church of
England, whom he calls the _Apostolical_ and the _Puritan_; introducing a
third also, (not now in the controversy,) namely, the Latitudinarian.
{9a}
In point of _doctrine_, the terms Apostolical, Laudian, Orthodox, and
Anglo-catholic, have more or less of connexion with each other; and the
terms Evangelical, Puritan, Calvinistic, and Protestant, have a similar
affinity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account