Authors, English -- 20th century -- Biography; Bennett, Arnold, 1867-1931
When I had recovered from my stupefaction, I glowed with pride. What a
fine thing to be highly-strung, nervously organized! I saw myself in a
new light; I thought better of myself; I rather looked down on cool,
ingenious journalists. Perhaps I dimly suspected that Fleet Street was
not to be the end of all things for me. It was soon afterwards that the
artists whom I had twitted about their temperament accused me of sharing
it with them to the full. Another surprise! I was in a state of ferment
then. But I had acquired such a momentum in the composition of articles
destined to rejection that I continued throughout this crisis to produce
them with a regularity almost stupid. My friends began to inquire into
the nature of my ultimate purpose. They spoke of a large work, and I
replied that I had no spare time. None could question my industry. "Why
don't you write a novel on Sundays?" one of them suggested.
The idea was grandiose. To conceive such an idea was a proof of
imagination. And the air with which these enthusiasts said these things
was entirely splendid and magnificent. But I was just then firmly
convinced that I had no vocation for the novel; I had no trace of a
desire to emulate Turgenev. Again and again my fine enthusiasts returned
to the charge, urged on by I know not what instinct. At last, to please
them, to quieten them, I promised to try to write a short story. Without
too much difficulty I concocted one concerning an artist's model, and
sent it to a weekly which gives a guinea each week for a prize story. My
tale won the guinea.
"There! We told you so!" was the chorus. And I stood convicted of
underestimating my own powers; fault rare enough in my career!
However, I insisted that the story was despicably bad, a commercial
product, and the reply was that I ought next to write one for art's
sake. Instead, I wrote one for morality's sake. It was a story with a
lofty purpose, dealing with the tragedy of a courtesan's life. (No, I
had not then read "Splendeurs et Misères des Courtisanes.") A prominent
philanthropist with a tendency to faddism, who for morality's sake was
running a monthly magazine, was much impressed by my tale, and after
some trouble--the contributors were supposed to contribute _con
amore_--I got another guinea. This story only pleased me for a few
weeks; its crudity was too glaring. But I continued to write short
stories, and several of them appeared in halfpenny evening papers.
Gaining in skill, I aimed political skits in narrative form at the more
exclusive, the consciously superior, penny evening papers, and one or
two of these hit the mark. I admired the stuff greatly. Lo, I had risen
from a concocter of 'bits' articles to be the scorpion-sting of cabinet
ministers! My self-confidence began to return.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account