Authors, English -- 20th century -- Biography; Bennett, Arnold, 1867-1931
First on my own paper, and subsequently on two others, I practised
dramatic criticism for five or six years. Although I threw it up in the
end mainly from sheer lassitude, I enjoyed the work. It means late
nights, and late nights are perdition; but there is a meretricious
glamour about it that attracts the foolish moth in me, and this I am
bound to admit. My trifling influence over the public was decidedly on
the side of the angels. I gradually found that I possessed a coherent
theory of the drama, definite critical standards, and all the rest of
the apparatus; in short, that I had something to say. And my verdicts
had a satisfactory habit of coinciding with those of the two foremost
theatrical critics in London--perhaps in Europe (I need not name them).
It is a somewhat strange fact that I made scarcely any friends in the
theatre. After all those years of assiduous first-nighting, I was almost
as solitary in the auditorium on the evening when I bade a _blase_ adieu
to the critical bench as when I originally entered it. I fancied I had
wasted my time and impaired my constitution in emulating the
achievements of Théophile Gautier, Hazlitt, Francisque Sarcey and M.
Jules Lemaître, to say nothing of Dutton Cook and Mr. Clement Scott. My
health may have suffered; but, as it happened, I had not quite wasted my
time.
"Why don't you write a play yourself?"
This blunt question was put to me by a friend, an amateur actor, whom I
had asked to get up some little piece or other for an entertainment in
the Theatre Royal back-drawing-room of my house.
"Quite out of my line," I replied, and I was absolutely sincere. I had
no notion whatever of writing for the stage. I felt sure that I had not
the aptitude.
"Nonsense!" he Exclaimed. "It's as easy as falling off a log."
We argued, and I was on the point of refusing the suggestion, when the
spirit of wild adventure overcame me, and I gravely promised my friend
that I would compose a duologue if he and his wife would promise to
perform it at my party. The affair was arranged. I went to bed with the
conviction that in the near future I stood a fair chance of looking an
ass. However, I met with what I thought to be an amusing idea for a
curtain-raiser the next morning, and in the afternoon I wrote the piece
complete. I enjoyed writing it, and as I read it aloud to myself I
laughed at it. I discovered that I had violated the great canon of
dramatic art,--Never keep your audience in the dark, and this troubled
me (Paul Hervieu had not then demonstrated by his "L'Enigme" that
canon may be broken with impunity); but I could not be at the trouble of
reconstructing the whole play for the sake of an Aristotelian maxim. I
at once posted the original draft to my friend with this note: "Dear
----, Here is the play which last night I undertook to write for you."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account