The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and educationAnonymous
History
The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and education
Anonymous
Church attendance -- Great Britain; Church of England; Great Britain -- Census, 1851
After all, the number of sittings a religious body can open in the
morning is the real test of its strength. Amongst persons of every
denomination there is a strong feeling that they ought to frequent their
own place of worship in the morning, but in the after part of the day
many persons do not consider themselves called upon to attend again, or
they feel themselves at liberty to visit other churches or meetings. In
short, to speak technically, the morning service is looked upon by
everybody as a service of “obligation,” while all the rest are regarded
as mere services of “devotion.” Now, of the 5,317,915 sittings belonging
to the Church, no fewer than 4,852,645 were actually available on the
Census morning. The remaining 465,270 were almost exclusively in the
country, where one clergyman has still often to serve more than one
parish or chapelry. Cases of this kind have of late years been much
diminished, owing to the operation of the Pluralities Act, and still more
in consequence of the increased zeal, both of the clergy and the laity.
The Bishop of Salisbury stated in his primary charge that the number of
churches in that diocese having two sermons on Sunday had increased
during the episcopate of Dr. Denison (16 years) from 143 to 426; and the
number having monthly communions from 35 to 181. The increase in the
number of church sittings during the past half century may be considered
as nett, for there can be no doubt that nearly all the new buildings have
the double service. At all events, if there are any that have not, they
are more than compensated for by those ancient churches where there was
formerly only one service on the Lord’s Day, but where there are now two.
On the other hand, the Dissenters are not able to open quite
three-fourths of their sittings on the Sunday morning; and as there is no
reason whatever for supposing that their new accommodation is exempt from
this deduction, we may subtract one-fourth from the gross number assigned
in the tables to each period.
The following table, compiled on the assumption that 58 per cent. of the
population might attend divine worship on any Sunday morning, will show
at a glance the number of sittings really required at each decennial
period, and the real provision made to supply the deficiency:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account