The Truth About Jesus : Is He a Myth?: Illustrated — John Shaqi
The Truth About Jesus : Is He a Myth?: IllustratedMangasarian, M. M. (Mangasar Mugurditch)
Religion
The Truth About Jesus : Is He a Myth?: Illustrated
Mangasarian, M. M. (Mangasar Mugurditch)
Jesus Christ -- Historicity; Rationalism
When this truth dawned upon Mr. Holyoake he ceased to petition Heaven,
which was like "dropping a bucket into an empty well," and began to
look _elsewhere_ for help. * The world owes its advancement to the
fact that men no longer look to Heaven for help, but help themselves.
Self-effort, and not prayer, is the remedy against ignorance, slavery,
poverty, and moral degradation. Fortunately, by holding up before us
an impossible Jesus, with his impossible promises, the churches have
succeeded only in postponing, but not in preventing, the progress of
man. This is a compliment to human nature, and it is well earned. It
is also a promise that in time humanity will be completely emancipated
from every phantom which in the past has scared it into silence or
submission, and
"A loftier race than e'er the world
Hath known shall rise
With flame of liberty in their souls,
And light of science in their eyes."
* Bygones Worth Remembering.--George Jacob Holyoake
[Illustration: 061 Portion of Manuscript Supposed to Be Copy of Lost
Originals.]
THE CHRISTIAN DOCUMENTS
The documents containing the story of Jesus are so unlike those about
Lincoln or any other historical character, that we must be doubly
vigilant in our investigation.
The Christians rely mainly on the four Gospels for the historicity
of Jesus. But the original documents of which the books in the New
Testament are claimed to be faithful copies are not in existence.
_There is absolutely no evidence that they ever were in existence_.
This is a statement which can not be controverted. Is it conceivable
that the early believers lost through carelessness or purposely
_every_ document written by an apostle, while guarding with all
protecting jealousy and zeal the writings of anonymous persons? Is
there any valid reason why the contributions to Christian literature
of an inspired apostle should perish while those of a nameless scribe
are preserved, why the original Gospel of Matthew should drop quietly
out of sight, no one knows how, while a supposed copy of it in an
alien language is preserved for many centuries? Jesus himself, it
is admitted, did not write a single line. He had come, according to
popular belief, to reveal the will of God--a most important mission
indeed, and yet he not only did not put this revelation in writing
during his lifetime, and with his own hand, which it is natural to
suppose that a divine teacher, expressly come from heaven, would have
done, but he left this all-important duty to anonymous chroniclers,
who, naturally, made enough mistakes to split up Christendom into
innumerable factions. It is worth a moment's pause to think of
the persecutions, the cruel wars, and the centuries of hatred and
bitterness which would have been spared our unfortunate humanity,
if Jesus himself had written down his message in the clearest and
plainest manner, instead of leaving it to his supposed disciples
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account