The Truth About Port ArthurNozhin, E. K. (Evgenii Konstantinovich)
History
The Truth About Port Arthur
Nozhin, E. K. (Evgenii Konstantinovich)
Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905
'Thus they can easily beat us without losing a single big ship, and
all damage to ships or guns could be quickly made good in port, after
replacing the disabled guns and supplementing the crew. At sunset the
big ships would cease fighting, to rest, while two, three, or four
destroyer divisions would attack or menace us all night, so that the
crews would get no sleep, and we should be forced to waste ammunition
till morning. The speed of our fleet would in all probability
diminish, as the battered funnels (one of the principal destructions
on August 10) increase the expenditure of coal and prevent proper
pressure being maintained. If steaming thirteen knots, the voyage
to Vladivostock takes four days: it will take longer at less
speed--_i.e._, at eight knots the passage would take six days. On the
morning of the second day the enemy's battleships, having repaired
and rested, would again, whenever it suited them, fall on our tired
fleet, and so on repeat their tactics till the island of Tsu-shima,
where a fresh division of four armoured cruisers and destroyers would
be waiting for us; and there, close to their shores, their fortresses
and ports, the enemy would try and bring on a decisive action. We
could not ram, as this operation requires superior speed. Indeed, it
would be a miracle if we got to Vladivostock, and, having lost the
remainder of our Pacific Ocean Fleet, we would be giving the enemy
a fresh victory, and, what is more important, depriving the Baltic
Fleet of the possibility of destroying them, since it is weaker than
the enemy, both in numbers of ships and of guns, in its many types of
vessels, in speed, and in the fact that it will have to force its way
through to a base--Vladivostock--without which no fleet can operate.'
CHAPTER XXXVI
A COUNCIL MEETING
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account