The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
A Turkish historian, Kotchi Bey, who wrote on the decline of the
Ottoman Empire in 1623, about sixty years after the death of Solyman,
and who has been described by Von Hammer as the Turkish Montesquieu,
attributed the decline in great part to the following causes:—
1. The cessation in Solyman’s time of the regular attendance of the
Sultan at the meetings of the Divan, or great Council of State.
Solyman had a window constructed in an adjoining room opening into
the council chamber, where, hidden behind a veil, he could listen
to the discussions of the Divan without taking a part in them. His
successors ceased even to listen from behind the veil. This absence of
the Sultan from his Council added to his arbitrary power and belittled
the influence of his ministers. So long as a very competent man like
Solyman was on the throne, this new practice may not have produced the
worst results, but in the case of his incompetent successors it led to
immense evils. The Sultan was finally swayed in his decisions not by
his responsible ministers or his Grand Council, but by the inmates of
his harem or by other irresponsible and corrupt outsiders.
2. The habit introduced by Solyman of appointing men to high office
who had not passed through the grades of lower offices. The first and
most conspicuous case of this kind was the promotion of Ibrahim, the
favourite companion of Solyman, from the post of Master of the Pages in
the Sultan’s household to that of Grand Vizier. Numerous other cases
could be quoted of a less conspicuous character. Solyman, in fact,
appointed outsiders to every kind of office, however important. Eunuchs
and renegades of all kinds were elevated to the highest posts. Solyman
himself appears to have been a very good judge of men, and rarely
made mistakes in his appointments, but his successors had no such
discernment, and appointments were conferred at the caprice, or under
the influence of the harem or otherwise, on the most unfit persons.
3. The venality and corruption first practised by Roostem Pasha, who
was Grand Vizier for fifteen years, and who was married to Solyman’s
daughter. The principal merit of Roostem in the eyes of his master was
his skill in replenishing the treasury. Among the means he adopted of
raising money was the exaction of large payments from persons on their
appointment to civil offices in the State. These payments in Solyman’s
time were fixed in a definite proportion to the salaries. They were
not adopted in the military and naval services. Under later Sultans
they became arbitrary and exorbitant, and were extended to the army
and navy. Practically appointments of all kinds were put up to auction
and given to the highest bidder. In order to meet these payments on
appointment, governors of provinces and all officials, down to the
lowest, were induced to adopt corrupt practices of all kinds and the
sense of public duty was destroyed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account