The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay — John Shaqi
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
So long ago, also, as in 1855 and 1857, I spent some time at
Constantinople and travelled in Bulgaria and Greece, and was able
to appreciate the effects of Turkish rule. As a result, I gave a
full support, in 1876, to Mr. Gladstone in his efforts to secure
the independence of Bulgaria, and in 1879 was an active member of a
committee, presided over by Lord Rosebery, which had for its object
the extension of the kingdom of Greece so as to include the provinces
inhabited by Greeks still suffering under Turkish rule.
In 1887 and 1890 I again visited the East and travelled over the same
ground as thirty years earlier, and was able to observe the immense
improvements which had been effected in the provinces that had gained
independence, and how little change had taken place at Constantinople.
In view of these experiences and of the further great changes portended
in Turkey after the conclusion of the present great war, I have
thought it may be of use to tell, in a compact and popular form, the
story of the growth and decay of the Turkish Empire.
History may well be told at many different lengths and from different
points of view. That of the Ottoman Empire, from the accession of
Othman in 1288 to the treaty of Kainardji in 1774, which secured to
Russia a virtual protectorate in favour of the Christian subjects of
Turkey, has been told at its greatest length by the German professor,
Von Hammer, in eighteen volumes. He is the only historian who has
explored for this long period both Greek and Turkish annals.
The British historian, Knolles, writing in 1610, told the story of the
growth of the Turkish Empire in two bulky folio volumes, much admired
by two such different authorities as Dr. Johnson and Lord Byron. The
work is based on a few only of the Greek annals. It is very discursive
and imperfect, but it contains many most terse and striking passages.
Gibbon, the historian of the Roman Empire, and Sir Edwin Pears, in his
most interesting book on the Destruction of the Greek Empire, have also
relied on Greek authorities up to the capture of Constantinople by the
Turks in 1453, before which date there were no Turkish historians. Very
recently, in 1916, Mr. Herbert Gibbons, of the Princeton University,
published a very valuable work on the foundations of the Ottoman
Empire, dealing with its first four great Sultans. He has again
examined with very great care the numerous and conflicting early Greek
authorities, and has thrown much new light on the subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account