The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
THE first four years of Mahmoud’s long reign of thirty-one years were
fraught with bitter humiliation to him at the hands of the Janissaries.
There was no indication of his subsequent career, when he proved
himself to be the most able and resolute of Sultans since Solyman the
Magnificent. But he was also the most unfortunate, for he was unable
to prevent a greater reduction of the Turkish Empire than had been
incurred by any one of the long line of degenerate Sultans. It may
well be, however, that but for his action still greater losses would
have resulted, for on his advent to the throne the Empire seemed to
be on the brink of ruin. In every part of it turbulent and rebellious
pashas were asserting independence. In Epirus the celebrated Ali Pasha
of Janina had cast off allegiance, and was threatening to extend
his rule over Greece, Thessaly, and the Ionian Islands. At Widdin
on the Danube, at Bagdad on the Tigris, at Acre in Syria, the same
process was being pursued by other pashas. In Egypt, Mehemet Ali
had assumed the position of Governor and was creating an army and a
navy independent of the Porte. In Arabia, the sect of Wahabees had
attained a virtual independence, and had obtained possession of the
holy cities. Other provinces, such as Serbia, Wallachia, Moldavia,
and Greece, were seething with disaffection caused by long and
intolerable misgovernment. The difficulty of holding together the
distracted Empire was greatly increased by the want of an effective
army under the full control of the central Government, so as to enable
it to cope with the centrifugal forces which threatened disruption.
The Janissaries, who had contributed so largely to the growth of the
Empire, were now a standing danger to it. They were able to overawe
the Sultan, and to dictate to him the appointment and dismissal of
Viziers. But successive campaigns on the Danube, and conflicts with
rebellious pashas, had given abundant proof of their inefficiency as a
military force. Compared with the armies of European Powers they were
an ill-disciplined and badly armed mob. They arrogantly refused to be
armed, clothed, and drilled after the fashion of European armies. While
useless for war, they were formidable for other purposes. They were
under no control. They terrorized the capital, and in the provinces
they were at the disposal of any adventurous pasha who suborned
them to support his ambitious and rebellious projects. Mahmoud from
the earliest years of his reign fully recognized, as many of his
predecessors had done, how urgent the necessity was to put an end to
this turbulent force, and to create a new army which would obey and
support him as Sultan, and be of value against external enemies. It is
his principal claim in the history of Turkey that he was able to effect
this. Eighteen years, however, elapsed before he felt strong enough to
grapple with these foes of his dynasty and State.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account