The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
On April 26, 1828, Russia declared war against Turkey. England and
France found themselves in a position when they could not object, for
the Porte still refused their demands as regards Greece. They had
joined with Russia in destroying the Turkish fleet. They were now
compelled to stand by while the Russians invaded Turkey. The position,
and still more the results of the war, showed what a grave error
Mahmoud committed when he refused to agree to the scheme of the allied
Powers for granting autonomy to Greece under the suzerainty of Turkey.
If he had accepted, his fleet would have been intact. England and
France would have been in a position to object to Russia’s schemes.
As it was, Greece secured an absolute independence, and Wallachia,
Moldavia, and Serbia were soon, by the victories of Russia, to secure
the status of complete autonomy which the Sultan had refused to Greece.
The Emperor Nicholas, in nominal command of his army, crossed the
Pruth on May 7, 1828. His force consisted of not more than sixty-five
thousand men, a surprisingly small number for the greatest military
Power in Europe to put into the field. It was necessary, however, to
keep a large army in Poland, where an outbreak was expected. Another
army was stationed in the Ukraine to watch Austria, who regarded the
Russian attack on Turkey with suspicion and malevolence; and a fourth
army of thirty thousand men, under General Paskiewich, invaded Asia
Minor from the Caucasus. With the main army it was hoped to cross the
Balkans and to menace Constantinople. The Turks offered no resistance
in Moldavia and Wallachia. But it was not till June 8th that the
Russians were able to effect a crossing over the Danube. The Sultan,
on his part, commenced the campaign under great disadvantages. His
old army of Janissaries had recently been destroyed. The new army,
equipped and drilled in the fashion of European armies, was very raw
and ill-trained. It consisted of very young men, who were recruited
with difficulty, often by compulsion, for the new service was very
unpopular, and the older men could not be induced to join. It did not
count more than forty-five thousand men, exclusive of the artillery.
It was supplemented by irregulars from Asia, and the total force under
arms was estimated at one hundred and eighty thousand men, of whom,
after providing for the defence of Constantinople and the Dardanelles,
for a reserve at Adrianople and for other demands on the Empire in
Europe and Asia, there remained only fifty thousand men to oppose the
Russians in Bulgaria, and to provide garrisons for the fortresses on
the Danube and for Schumla and Varna. These garrisons, however, were
supported by the armed Turkish inhabitants of the towns, who could be
relied on for a vigorous resistance. The Turks were under the further
disadvantage that the greater part of their fleet had been destroyed
at Navarino. The Russians were, in consequence, completely masters in
the Black Sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account