The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
They were able to send to the Ægean archipelago another
fleet, which blockaded the Dardanelles.
In spite of these difficulties, the Turks made an unexpectedly vigorous
defence against the Russian invasion in Europe. The campaign of 1828
was mainly one of sieges, where the Turkish soldiers, supported by
Moslems of the fortified towns, fought to the best advantage behind
walls and earthworks. They could make but a poor stand in the open
against their better trained enemy.
The Russians, after crossing the Danube, laid siege to Ibrail, the
most important fortress on the lower stretch of the river, and which
it was essentially necessary to capture before making an advance to
Schumla. The garrison and inhabitants made a gallant resistance, and it
was only after five weeks that it was compelled to surrender, on June
17th. The Russian army was then divided into three parts—the one to
attack Silistria, the capture of which was almost as necessary as that
of Ibrail; the second to besiege Varna; the third and most important,
under the Emperor, to march to Schumla. The attack on Silistria
failed, and after some weeks the force employed against it marched in
the direction of Schumla to support the Czar’s army. Even with this
addition it was found impossible to invest the fortified camp of the
Turks behind Schumla, and, after a demonstration, it was compelled to
hold a defensive position, in front of Schumla, while the Czar and a
part of the army marched in support of the division before Varna.
On August 18th the Czar arrived there with a reinforcement of nine
thousand men, and the siege then commenced, while the Russian Black Sea
fleet of eight ships of the line and three frigates, under command of
Admiral Greig, joined in the attack from the sea. The Turks again made
a desperate and prolonged defence, which might have been successful if
it had not been that Jussuf Pasha, in command of the garrison, with
five thousand of his men, traitorously deserted the city, on October
14th, and threw themselves on the mercy of the Czar. The remainder
of the garrison, under the Capitan Pasha, refused to be a party to
the surrender. It was said that the cause of this extraordinary act
of treachery was that the Sultan, in pursuance of his policy of
concentrating all power and authority in himself, had been persuaded by
an intrigue to confiscate the property of Jussuf, who was one of the
few large landowners in Turkey, while the owner was gallantly fighting
the enemy at Varna. However that may be, the remaining garrison was
soon compelled to capitulate, and this most important stronghold fell
into the hands of the Russians. Without it no advance could possibly
have been made across the Balkans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account