The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
The campaign of 1828 came to an end with the surrender of Varna. Though
the Russians had been able to capture two of the four fortresses which
barred their way to the Balkans, the campaign had not been without
success to the Turks. They had shown unexpected powers of resistance,
and had prevented for a year the achievement of the main object of the
Russians—their advance to Constantinople. The losses of the Russians
had been very great, not only in the sieges, but by disease, which
dogged their armies as usual.
Baron von Moltke, the German general, who, at the invitation of the
Sultan, was with the Turkish headquarters during this war, writes of
the Russian and Turkish troops in his remarkable history of it:—
The faults of the Russian Staff were atoned for by the innate
excellence of the Russian troops. The self-sacrificing obedience of
the commanders, the steadiness of the common soldiers, their power
of endurance and unshaken bravery in times of danger, were the
qualities that enabled them to avert the dangers of their position
before Schumla and to hold the Turks in check, and to make up for all
deficiencies and overcome all resistance at Varna.[32]
Of the Turks he adds:—
We cannot say much for the skill of the Turkish commanders, but the
conduct of the Turks, from the highest officers to the last soldier
at the storming of Ibrail, their courage and steadiness in the mines
and trenches before Varna, were far above all praise.
In Asia the Turks had not done so well. General Paskiewich was able to
defeat the army in front of him and to capture the important stronghold
of Kars and its adjoining district.
The campaign of 1829 began late. It was not till the middle of May that
the Russian army again took the field, not on this occasion under the
Czar, but under General Diebitsch, who proved to be a most able general
and diplomatist. The army was again most inadequate for the campaign
which was in contemplation—namely, the crossing of the Balkans and an
advance to Constantinople. It consisted of no more than sixty-eight
thousand men, a force which, in these days, eighty-eight years later,
would count for little or nothing. It was thought necessary, as a
condition precedent to any advance, to capture Silistria. The siege
was commenced on May 17, 1829. The Russian force detailed for this
was not more than fourteen thousand men. The Turks who defended it
were twenty-one thousand in number, including eight thousand armed
inhabitants. In spite of this disparity of numbers, the town was
captured after a siege of forty-four days, on July 26th, at a loss to
the Russians of two thousand five hundred men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account