The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
For a time the influence of Russia became predominant. None but
Russians had access to the Sultan. Russian troops and sailors were seen
everywhere, and Russian officers were employed to drill and command
the Turkish battalions. This state of things caused great alarm to the
British and French Governments. They were both concerned in preventing
Russia obtaining possession or control of Constantinople. They felt it
was necessary to stay the advance of Ibrahim’s victorious army, which
was the excuse for the presence of the Russians at Constantinople.
They offered, therefore, to the Sultan that if he would insist on the
withdrawal of the Russian army from his capital, they would guarantee
him against the further invasion of Mehemet Ali’s army. France, though
always very friendly to Mehemet Ali, and in favour of his independence
as against the Sultan, had no wish to see Constantinople in the hands
of Russia.
By dint of great diplomatic pressure, in which Lord Palmerston took
the leading part with the greatest ability, a double arrangement was
effected. On the one hand, Mehemet Ali, perceiving that he would be
powerless to attack Constantinople against the opposition of Russia,
England, and France, was induced to come to terms with the Sultan. A
convention was signed between them in 1833, and a firman was issued by
the Porte under which Mehemet was confirmed as the Pasha, not only of
Egypt, but of Syria, Damascus, Adana, Tripoli, and Crete, an immense
accession of dignity and power to him. The Sultan was to be suzerain
and the Pashalics were conferred on Mehemet Ali only for his life, and
there was no promise that they would be continued to his son Ibrahim
or other descendants. The concession, however, as it stood, was most
humiliating to the Sultan. On the other hand, Russia agreed with the
Porte to withdraw its troops from Constantinople and the Bosphorus, but
only on the promise, embodied in the treaty of Hunkar Iskelesi, that
Russian ships of war should have the privilege of passing through the
Bosphorus and Dardanelles, at any time, without obtaining the consent
of the Porte, a privilege which was to be denied to the ships of other
Powers, unless with the previous consent of Russia. It also secured to
Russia the right to send an army to the Bosphorus and land it there
whenever the exigencies of the Turkish Empire made it expedient to do
so. The firman to Mehemet Ali was dated May 5, 1833, and the treaty of
Hunkar Iskelesi was agreed to with Russia on July 8th of the same year.
By these two measures, the result of a great diplomatic struggle, the
menace of Mehemet Ali against Constantinople, which at one time seemed
likely to involve all the Powers in Europe in war, was brought to an
end. The Egyptian army was withdrawn into the provinces added to the
Pashalic of Mehemet Ali, and the Russian troops were recalled by the
Czar from Constantinople.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account