The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
What was new in the case of the Bulgarians in 1876, and was fraught
with misfortune to the Turkish cause, was that full and graphic
accounts of the horrors committed at Batak, written by Mr. Edwin Pears
(now Sir Edwin), the correspondent at Constantinople of the _Daily
News_, appeared in the columns of that paper. They produced a profound
impression on public opinion in England. Discredit was thrown on the
story in the House of Commons by Mr. Disraeli, the Prime Minister, but
it was fully confirmed by Mr. MacGahan, another correspondent of the
same paper, who visited the district, and later by Mr. Walter Baring, a
member of the British Embassy at Constantinople, who, by the direction
of the Government, made full personal inquiries on the spot. He
described what had taken place as “perhaps the most heinous crime that
has stained the history of the present century.”
It was also unfortunate for the Turks that Mr. Gladstone, the only
survivor in the House of Commons of the British statesmen responsible
for the Crimean War, who had recently retired from the leadership of
the Liberal party, was fired by the description of these horrors in
Bulgaria to emerge from his retirement and to take up the cause of the
Christian population of European Turkey, for which he held that the
treaty of Paris had made his country responsible.
Meanwhile the horrors at Batak had also aroused the indignation of
Russia and the fears of Austria. A fanatical outbreak of Moslems at
Salonika resulted in the murder of the Consuls of France and Germany.
Serbia and Montenegro, impelled by sympathy for their fellow Slavs
in Bosnia, declared war against Turkey. A Turkish force defeated the
Serbians, who appealed to Russia for assistance. At this stage another
effort was made by Russia and Austria, supported by Germany, to avert a
general conflagration, and a scheme was embodied in what was known as
the Berlin Memorandum for compelling the Porte to carry out the reforms
which it had admitted to be necessary. The British Government, however,
very curtly refused to be a party to the scheme, on the ground that
they had not been consulted in framing it and did not believe in its
success. About this time also the British fleet in the Mediterranean
was ordered to Besika Bay, a step taken avowedly for the purpose of
protecting British subjects in the turmoil which had arisen, but which
seemed to the Porte to indicate an intention to support them against
the demands of the other Powers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account