The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
A few days after the break-up of the Conference, Midhat Pasha was
ignominiously dismissed from office. The new Constitution did not
long survive its author. In May, 1877, Abdul Hamid suspended it and
dismissed the National Assembly which had been convoked. During the
two months of its existence its members had shown a determination to
expose the scandalous abuses of the Hamidian system. Later Abdul Hamid
trumped up a charge against Midhat of having been responsible for the
murder of Sultan Aziz. Two men employed by that Sultan, a wrestler and
a gardener, were suborned to confess that they strangled Aziz at the
instance of Midhat. Midhat was tried by corrupt judges and was not
allowed to cross-examine these men. He was found guilty and condemned
to death. At the instance mainly of the British Government the sentence
was commuted to banishment to Arabia. Midhat was there strangled
by order of Abdul Hamid in 1882, and his embalmed head was sent to
Constantinople, in order that the Sultan might be assured of his death.
The two men who had confessed to the murder of Aziz were released
and were pensioned by the Sultan. Sir Henry Elliot, who was British
Ambassador at Constantinople at the time of the death of Sultan Aziz,
put on record his conviction that it was a case of suicide, that the
charge against Midhat was trumped up, and that the whole proceedings
are an indelible stain on Abdul Hamid.
Meanwhile, in 1877, another attempt was made by the Great Powers to
effect a settlement of the Eastern question. Count Schouvaloff was
sent to London by the Emperor of Russia on a special mission for the
purpose. Agreement was arrived at between the Powers. It was embodied
in a protocol, and was presented to the Porte. It was promptly rejected
on April 10th by the Sultan as inconsistent with the treaty of Paris
by interfering with the independence of the Ottoman Empire. Russia
thereupon declared war against Turkey, justifying it in a dignified
manifesto, on the ground that the Sultan, by rejecting the protocol,
had defied Europe. Russia, therefore, held the strong position of
acting on behalf of Europe. England was the only Power to take
exception to this. Lord Derby, in a despatch to the Russian Government,
said that he and his colleagues regarded the action of Russia as
an obstacle to reform in Turkey, and held that the plight of the
Christian population could not be improved by war—a most unfortunate
prediction, as the result proved. More fortunate was the prediction of
Mr. Gladstone at the close of a speech which he made in the House of
Commons, on April 24, 1877, immediately after the declaration of war
by Russia, when moving a resolution intended to prevent the Government
from taking up a hostile attitude to Russia in the coming war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account