The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
The levy of children was regarded by the Christians as a blood tax of a
terrible kind. The corps thus formed was a most valuable instrument in
the hands of Sultans who were strong enough to control it. But later,
in the times of degenerate Sultans, it became a kind of Prætorian
Guard. It dictated the deposition of Sultans and the nomination of
their successors. It often insisted on a policy of war. In 1648, under
Mahomet IV, the restriction of the force to Christian children was
removed, and the sons of Janissaries and other Moslems were admitted.
Later the levy of Christian children was abandoned, and none but sons
of Moslems were admitted to the corps. After the time of Solyman its
numbers were greatly increased. It became a danger to the State. It
will be seen that in 1826 Mahmoud II took vengeance on it for the
humiliations he and previous Sultans had undergone, and extinguished it
in ruthless scenes of blood.
There cannot be a doubt, however, that Murad, by creating this corps of
Janissaries and recruiting it from the Christian population in Europe,
forged a weapon which for two hundred years to come played a dominant
part in the aggrandizement of the Ottoman Empire.
Knolles, in his graphic history of the Turkish Empire, sums up the
character of Murad in the following sentences, which could not be
improved upon:—
Murad was more zealous than any other of the Turkish kings; a man
of great courage and in all his attempts fortunate; he made greater
slaughter of his enemies than both his father and grandfather; his
kingdom in Asia he greatly enlarged by the sword, marriage, and
purchase; and using the discord and cowardice of the Grecian princes
to his profit, subdued a great part of Thracia, with the territories
adjoining thereto, leaving unto the Emperor of Constantinople little
or nothing more in Thracia than the imperial city itself, with the
bare name of an emperor almost without an empire; he won a great part
of Bulgaria and entered into Serbia, Bosnia, and Macedonia; he was
liberal and withal severe; of his subjects both beloved and feared; a
man of very few words, and one that could dissemble deeply.[7]
IV
BAYEZID I
1389-1403
BAYEZID succeeded his father, Murad, at the age of thirty-four. He
reigned as Sultan for only fourteen years, the last of which was
spent in captivity. No one of the Othman race passed through such
vicissitudes, with such a brilliant career of victory during nearly the
whole of his reign, but ending with overwhelming and crushing defeat.
He had all the courage and military capacity of his three predecessors.
He excelled them greatly in cruelty and brutality. In his private life
he descended to depths of sensuality and unmentionable and degrading
vice which were unknown to them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account