Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
The remarks offered by the Ottoman delegation about the peace
conditions presented by the Allies made up a little book of forty pages
with some appendices, which was handed to the Conference on the 25th.
The answer, which had been revised in Constantinople, and consisted
of forty-seven pages, was delivered a few days after; it differed but
little from the first.
This document began with the following protest against the conditions
enforced on Turkey:
“It was only fair—and it was also a right recognised by all nations
nowadays—that Turkey should be set on an equal footing with her
former allies. The flagrant inequality proffered by the draft of
the treaty will be bitterly resented not only by 12 million Turks,
but throughout the Moslem world.
“Nothing, indeed, can equal the rigour of the draft of the Turkish
treaty. As a matter of fact, it is a dismemberment.
“Not only do the Allies, in the name of the principle of
nationalities, detach important provinces from the Ottoman Empire
which they erect to the rank of free, independent States (Armenia
and the Hejaz), or independent States under the protection of a
mandatory Power (Mesopotamia, Palestine, and Syria); not only do
they wrench from it Egypt, Suez, and Cyprus, which are to be ceded
to Great Britain; not only do they require Turkey to give up all
her rights and titles to Libya and the States of the Ægean Sea:
they even mean to strip her, notwithstanding the said principle
of nationalities, of Eastern Thrace and the zone of Smyrna, which
countries, in a most iniquitous way, would be handed over to
Greece, who wants to be set on an equal footing with the victors,
though she has not even been at war with Turkey.
“Further, they are preparing to take Kurdistan and in an indirect
way to slice the rest of the country into zones of influence.
“In this way more than two-thirds of the extent of the Ottoman
Empire would already be taken from it. With regard to the number
of inhabitants, it would be at least two-thirds. If we consider
the economic wealth and natural resources of the country, the
proportion would be greater still.
“But that is not all. To this spoliation, the draft of the treaty
adds a notorious infringement on the sovereignty of the Ottoman
State. Even at Constantinople Turkey would not be her own mistress.
Side by side with His Imperial Majesty the Sultan and the Turkish
Government—or even above them in some cases—a ‘Commission of the
Straits’ would rule over the Bosphorus, the Sea of Marmora, and
the Dardanelles. Turkey would not even be represented in this
Commission, whereas Bulgaria would send a representative to it.
“In addition to these two powers, there would be a third one—the
military power exercised by the troops of occupation of three
States, whose headquarters would have the upper hand even of the
Ottoman gendarmerie.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account