Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
Mr. Gerard, former ambassador of the United States at Berlin, in a
telegram[39] addressed to Mr. Balfour on February 15, 1920, asserted
that treaties for the partition of Armenia had been concluded during
Mr. Balfour’s tenure of the post of Secretary for Foreign Affairs
and at a time when the Allied leaders and statesmen had adopted the
principle of self-determination of peoples as their principal war-cry.
He expressed distress over news that the Allies might cut up Armenia,
and said that 20,000 ministers, 85 bishops, 250 college and university
presidents, and 40 governors, who had “expressed themselves in favour
of unified Armenia, will be asked to join in condemnation of decimation
of Armenia.” He added that Americans had given £6,000,000 for Armenian
relief, and that another £6,000,000 had been asked for. Americans were
desirous of aiding Armenia during her formative period. “Ten members of
our committee, including Mr. Hughes and Mr. Root, and with the approval
of Senator Lodge, had telegraphed to the President that America should
aid Armenia. We are earnestly anxious that Britain should seriously
consider American opinion on the Armenian case. Can you not postpone
consideration of the Turkish question until after ratification of the
treaty by the Senate, which is likely to take place before March?”
Mr. Balfour, in his reply dispatched on February 24, said:
“In reply to your telegram of February 16, I should observe that
the first paragraph seems written under a misapprehension. I
concluded no treaties about Armenia at all.
“I do not understand why Great Britain will be held responsible
by 20,000 ministers of religion, 85 bishops, 250 university
professors, and 40 governors if a Greater Armenia is not forthwith
created, including Russian Armenia on the north and stretching to
the Mediterranean on the south.
“Permit me to remind you of the facts.
“1. Great Britain has no interests in Armenia except those based
on humanitarian grounds. In this respect her position is precisely
that of the United States.
“2. I have always urged whenever I had an opportunity that the
United States should take its share in the burden of improving
conditions in the pre-war territories of the Turkish Empire and
in particular that it should become the mandatory in Armenia.
Events over which Great Britain had no control have prevented this
consummation and have delayed, with most unhappy results, the
settlement of the Turkish peace.
“3. There appears to be great misconception as to the condition of
affairs in Armenia. You make appeal in your first sentence to the
principle of self-determination. If this is taken in its ordinary
meaning as referring to the wishes of the majority actually
inhabiting a district, it must be remembered that in vast regions
of Greater Armenia the inhabitants are overwhelmingly Mussulman,
and if allowed to vote would certainly vote against the Armenians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account