Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“I do not think this conclusive; but it must not be forgotten.
Whoever undertakes, in your own words, to aid Armenia during her
formative period must, I fear, be prepared to use military force.
Great Britain finds the utmost difficulty in carrying out the
responsibilities she has already undertaken. She cannot add Armenia
to their number. America with her vast population and undiminished
resources, and no fresh responsibilities thrown upon her by the
war, is much more fortunately situated. She has shown herself most
generous towards these much oppressed people; but I greatly fear
that even the most lavish charity, unsupported by political and
military assistance, will prove quite insufficient to deal with the
unhappy consequences of Turkish cruelty and misrule.
“If I am right in inferring from your telegram that my attitude on
the question has been somewhat misunderstood in America, I should
be grateful if you would give publicity to this reply.”
On February 28 Mr. Gerard telegraphed to Mr. Balfour that in referring
to treaties made during Mr. Balfour’s period of office he had in mind
the Sykes-Picot compact. After saying that “Great Britain and France
could not be justified in requiring American aid to Armenia as a
condition precedent to their doing justice to Armenia,” he declared
that “Armenia’s plight since 1878 is not unrelated to a series of
arrangements, well meant, no doubt, in which Great Britain played a
directive rôle,” and he concluded in the following terms:
“Our faith in chivalry of Great Britain and France and our
deliberate conviction in ultimate inexpediency of allowing Turkish
threat to override concerted will of Western civilisation through
further sacrifice of Armenia inspire us to plead with you to
construe every disadvantage in favour of Armenia and ask you to
plan to aid her toward fulfilment of her legitimate aspirations,
meanwhile depending on us to assume our share in due time, bearing
in mind imperative necessity of continued concord that must exist
between our democracies for our respective benefit and for that of
the world.”
Soon after, Lord Curzon said in the House of Lords: “It must be owned
the Armenians during the last weeks did not behave like innocent little
lambs, as some people imagine. The fact is they have indulged in a
series of wild attacks, and proved blood-thirsty people.” _The Times_
gave an account of these atrocities on March 19.
At the beginning of February, 1920, the British Armenia Committee
of London had handed to Mr. Lloyd George a memorandum in which the
essential claims of Armenia were set forth before the Turkish problem
was definitely settled by the Allies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account