Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
The Arabian opposition to France which made itself felt far beyond the
boundaries of independent Syria, the difficulties raised by the Emir
Feisal in the coast area, and the agitation stirred up by the Damascus
Government in Syria since the French troops had relieved the English
in those parts in October, 1919, induced General Gouraud to occupy
the railway stations of Maalhakah and Rayak, the latter being at the
junction of the railway line from Aleppo with the Beyrut-Damascus line
leading to the Hejaz. At the same time, by way of reprisal for the
capture of Mejel-Anjar in the plain of Bukaa lying between Libanus and
Anti-Libanus by the Sherifian troops, he gathered his forces in the
rear of that town at Zahleh and decided to occupy all this area, which
was within the zone put under French control by the 1916 treaty.
On July 20 the Emir Feisal held a war council at Damascus and issued a
decree of general mobilisation.
According to the Memoirs of Liman von Sanders, who commanded the
Turkish troops in Syria-Palestine, doubts may be raised as to the Emir
Feisal’s straightforwardness in his dealings first with the Turks
during the war, and later with both the English and the French after
the cessation of hostilities.
“The commander of the fourth army, Jemal Pasha, informed me in
the second half of August that the Sherif Feisal was willing to
hold the front occupied by the fourth army along the Jordan on
his own account and with his own troops, if guarantees were given
him by the Turkish Government as to the creation of an Arabian
State. According to the Sherif Feisal an important British attack
was being prepared in the coast zone, and in this way it would be
possible to reinforce the front between the sea and the Jordan with
the troops of the fourth army. Through my Turkish brigadier-general
I instructed General Jemal Pasha to enter into negotiations with
the Sherif Feisal on this point, and I urged Enver to give the
guarantees that were demanded.
“I never had any answer from either Enver or Jemal on this point.
So I cannot say to what extent Feisal’s offer could be relied upon.
According to what I heard from my brigadier-general, I fancy the
Turks mistrusted his offer, which they considered as a mere decoy
to put our positions along the Jordan in the hands of the Arabs,
while the main English attack was to take place in the coast zone
or between the sea and the Jordan.”[42]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account