“They are not able to cope with the Greeks, who, under pretence of pacific dealings, take vengeance for the war of extermination, the traces of which are still to be seen in Cydonia and Chio. They do not stand an equal chance of winning; most of them only know their own language, while a Greek speaks several languages; they are ignorant and artless by the side of clever, shrewd adversaries. Though he is not lazy, the Turk does not like to hurry; ‘Haste is devilish, patience is godly,’ he will often say. He cannot do without his ‘kief,’ an idle dream in which he lives like a mere plant, without any exertion of his mind and will, whereas his rival, always in earnest, can derive profit even from his hours of rest. The very qualities of the Turk do him harm: honest, trustworthy, he will work to the end of his life to pay off a debt, and the business man takes advantage of this to offer him long credits that shall make a slave of him for ever. There is an axiom among business men in Asia Minor: ‘If you wish to thrive, do not grant a Christian more credit than one-tenth of his fortune; risk ten times as much with a Mohammedan.’ Encumbered with such a credit, the Turk no longer possesses anything of his own; all the produce of his work will go to the usurer. His carpets, his wares, his flocks, even his land, will pass gradually into the hands of the foreigner.”[5] But since the time when this was written the Turkish mind has changed. The Turks have set to work to learn languages, especially French. A large part of the younger generation concern themselves with what takes place in the West, and this transformation, which the Greeks and other Europeans looked upon as endangering their situation in Turkey, may be one of the factors of the present conflict. Besides, E. Reclus added: “The Greeks already hold, to the great prejudice of the Turks, numerous industries and all the so-called liberal professions, and as dragomans and journalists they are the only informers of the Europeans, and control public opinion in the West.”[6] Footnotes: 1: J. Deniker, _Les Races et les peuples de la terre_ (Paris, 1900), p. 438. Zaborowski, _Tartares de la Lithuanie_ (1913). 2: Deguignes, _Histoire générale des Huns_ (1750 and 1756); L. Cahun, _Turcs et Mongols, des origins à 1405_ (Paris, 1896); Vambéry, _Das Turkenvolk_ (1885). 3: Elisée Reclus, _Nouvelle géographie universelle_ (1884), ix., p. 547. 4: _Ibid._, p. 536. 5: Elisée Reclus, _Nouvelle géographie universelle_ (1884), ix., p. 546. 6: _Ibid._, p. 550. II THE TURKISH EMPIRE