Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“We had hoped that two of the great countries of the world would
have been able to help us in sharing the responsibility for the
government of this troubled country; but for one reason or another
they have fallen out. There was first of all Russia. She is out of
the competition for a very unpleasant task. Then there was America.
We had hopes, and we had good reason for hoping, that America would
have shared these responsibilities. She might probably have taken
the guardianship of the Armenians, or she might have taken the
guardianship of Constantinople. But America is no claimant now, and
I am not going to express an opinion as to whether she ever will
be, because it would be dangerous to do so; but for the moment we
must reckon America as being entirely out of any arrangement which
we contemplate for the government of Turkey and for the protection
of the Christian minorities in that land.... I ask my noble friend,
if he were an Armenian would he feel more secure if he knew that
the Sultan and his Ministers were overlooked by a British garrison
on the Bosphorus, and that British ships were there within reach,
than if the Sultan were at Konia, with hundreds of miles across
the Taurus Mountains to the nearest Allied garrison, and the sea
with its great British ships and their guns out of sight and out of
mind? I know which I would prefer if I were an Armenian with a home
to protect.”[18]
The Prime Minister concluded his speech by saying that the Allies
chiefly desired to take from the Turks the government of communities of
alien race and religion, which would feel adequately protected when
they knew that their former persecutors must sign the decree for their
liberation under the threat of English, French, and Italian guns. Yet
he could not dissemble his own misgivings.
In the discussion that followed Lord Robert Cecil said that, in any
settlement with regard to Armenia, he trusted there would not only be a
considerable increase in the present area of the Armenian Republic, but
that Armenia would be given some access to the Black Sea in the north.
Without that he was satisfied that the Armenian Republic would have the
greatest difficulty in living. He earnestly hoped that every influence
of the British Government would be used to secure that Cilicia
should be definitely removed from Turkish sovereignty. He repeated
once more that he was sorry the Turks were going to be retained in
Constantinople, but that—
“No one wished to turn the Sultan out; the central thing was to get
rid of the Sublime Porte as the governor of Constantinople. That
did not mean turning anybody out; it merely meant that we were not
to hand back Constantinople to the Turkish Government.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account