Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
He had the greatest regard for the feelings of the Indians in
that matter, but was surprised they insisted upon the retention
of the Sultan in Constantinople. He thought that there was not
the slightest ground for maintaining the Sultan as Caliph of
Mohammedanism, and, even if there were, there was nothing at all
vital about his remaining in Constantinople. So far as the Turks
were concerned, what was Constantinople? It was not a national
capital; it had been occupied by the Turks as their great trophy
of victory. He entirely approved of the statement of 1918, and,
in the same circumstances, he would make it again. It seemed to
him perfectly fantastic to say that ever since 1918 we had held
out to our Indian fellow-subjects an absolute undertaking that
Constantinople should remain in the hands of the Turks.
Then Mr. Bonar Law rose, and declared that it would be easier
to have control over the Turkish Government if it was left in
Constantinople, instead of transferring it to Konia,
“Our fleet at Constantinople would be a visible emblem of power.
The Allies believed that the pressure they would be able to
exercise would have an effect throughout the Turkish Empire, but it
would not be so if we sent the Turks to Konia. An hon. member had
said that some Armenians had told him that they desired the Turks
to be sent out of Constantinople. Let the Armenians consider the
facts as they now were.
“If there was one thing which more than another was likely to make
the League of Nations a failure it was to hand over this question
to them. In 1917 it was arranged that if we were victorious in the
war, Russia would become the possessor of Constantinople. But all
that fell to the ground, and in 1918 a new situation arose, and
a solemn document was put before the British people in which it
was stated that one of our war aims was not to turn the Turks out
of Constantinople. Overwhelming reasons were required to justify
departure from that declaration, and those overwhelming reasons had
not been forthcoming. When it was hoped and expected that America
would accept a mandate in regard to Turkey there was no question of
turning the Turks out of Constantinople.”[19]
The debate, which came to an end after this statement by Mr. Bonar Law,
was not followed by a vote.
Mr. Montagu, Secretary for India, stated in an interview printed in the
_Evening Standard_, February 25:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account