France -- History -- Henry II, 1547-1559 -- Fiction; Montgomery, Gabriel, comte de, 1530-1574 -- Fiction
"It is probable, but not certain," was Gabriel's reply. "That devil of
an Arnauld addressed a very crafty and convincing speech to the judges
yesterday."
"Cursed fool that I was!" thought Arnauld.
"While you, on the other hand, Martin," continued Gabriel, "you, who
have just demonstrated to me with such admirable eloquence and
conviction the necessity for Arnauld's death, could not, you will
remember, find a single word to say before the court yesterday, nor
could you adduce a single argument or a single fact to aid in the
triumph of truth. You were confused and remained almost dumb, in spite
of my urgency. Although you had been informed as to your adversary's
arguments, you did not know how to meet and reply to them."
"The reason is, Monseigneur," was Arnauld's response, "that I am at my
ease with you alone, while all those judges frightened me. Besides, I
confess that I relied upon the righteousness of my cause. It seemed to
me that justice would plead for me better than I could for myself. But
that seems not to be the case with these men of the law. They want
words, nothing but words, I can see now. Ah, if it could only begin
again, or if they would hear me even now!"
"Why, what would you do, Martin?"
"Oh, I would pluck up a little courage, and then I would speak. It would
not be a difficult matter by any means to demolish all the proofs and
allegations of Arnauld du Thill."
"I tell you that would not be an easy matter!" said Gabriel.
"Pardon me, Monseigneur," replied Arnauld; "I can see the weak points in
his strategy as clearly as he can see them himself, and if I had been
less timid, and if words had not failed me, I would have told the
judges--"
"Well, what would you have told them, pray? Just tell me."
"What would I have told them? Why, nothing could be simpler."
Thereupon Arnauld du Thill set to work to refute his speech of the
evening before, point by point. He unravelled the events and the
mistakes of the double existence of Martin-Guerre and Arnauld with so
much the more facility, because he had tangled them up himself. The
Comte de Montgommery had left certain matters still obscure in the minds
of the judges, because he had been unable to explain them to his own
satisfaction, but Arnauld du Thill elucidated them with marvellous
clearness. The result of his discourse was to show Gabriel the two
destinies of the honest man and the rascal as clearly and sharply
defined and distinguished, for all the confusion there had been in.
regard to them, as that between oil and water when put in the same
vessel.
"Have you then been collecting information at Paris on your own
account?" asked Gabriel.
"Without doubt I have, Monseigneur; and in case of need I could furnish
proofs of what I say. I am not easily excited, but when I am driven into
my last intrenchments, I can make energetic sorties."
"But," Gabriel continued, "Arnauld du Thill invoked the testimony of
Monsieur de Montmorency, and you do not reply to that."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account