The Two Maps of Europe, and Some Other Aspects of the Great War — John Shaqi
The Two Maps of Europe, and Some Other Aspects of the Great WarBelloc, Hilaire
History
The Two Maps of Europe, and Some Other Aspects of the Great War
Belloc, Hilaire
Europe -- Politics and government; Military art and science; World War, 1914-1918
(_b_) Numbers, when they are quoted in connexion with a
really ascertainable fact, and with regard to a precise
and concrete circumstance, are nearly always reliable;
though their significance differs, as I shall show in
a moment, very greatly according to the way they are
treated. Thus, if a Government says, “in such-and-such a
place or on such-and-such a day we took three thousand
prisoners,” it is presumably telling the truth, for the
enemy who has lost those prisoners knows it as well as
they do. But estimates of what has happened in the way of
numbers, where the Government issuing the estimate can have
no direct knowledge, are quite another matter. These are
only gathered from prisoners or from spies, and are often
ridiculously wrong.
(_c_) All official communiqués of whatever Government
conceal reverses, save in minor points. They are wise to do
this because there is no need to tell the enemy more than
he may know of his own success. Reverses are not actually
denied. They are omitted. Witness all omission of Lemberg
from Austrian or German communiqués and, until somewhat
late, of Tannenberg in Russian, of Metz in French official
accounts.
Those are the three points which all the official communiqués have
in common, and by bearing them well in mind we can often frame
an accurate picture, in spite of the apparent contradiction and
confusion which the reading of several communiqués one after the
other produces.
For instance, the Germans are trying to cross the Bzura River
according to the Russian communiqué of Saturday. Next Wednesday
the Russian communiqué says, “Two attempts to cross the Bzura at
such-and-such places were repelled”; while the German communication
says, “Our troops succeeded in crossing the Bzura River at
such-and-such a village and established themselves upon the right
bank.” In such a case the reader will be wise to believe the German
communiqué and to take it for granted that while the Russians have
repelled certain other attempts of the enemy to cross, this attempt
has succeeded. But if the Germans go on to say, “The Russians retired
after suffering losses which cannot have been less than twenty
thousand,” that is no news at all. It is obviously conjecture.
The various Governments issuing the communiqués have acquired certain
habits in them which are worth noting if one is attempting to get
at an accurate view of the war, and these habits may be briefly
described as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account