Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; London (England) -- Description and travel
We were impanelled to inquire concerning the death of a very little mite
of a child. It was the old miserable story. Whether the mother had
committed the minor offence of concealing the birth, or whether she had
committed the major offence of killing the child, was the question on
which we were wanted. We must commit her on one of the two issues.
The Inquest came off in the parish workhouse, and I have yet a lively
impression that I was unanimously received by my brother Jurymen as a
brother of the utmost conceivable insignificance. Also, that before we
began, a broker who had lately cheated me fearfully in the matter of a
pair of card-tables, was for the utmost rigour of the law. I remember
that we sat in a sort of board-room, on such very large square horse-hair
chairs that I wondered what race of Patagonians they were made for; and
further, that an undertaker gave me his card when we were in the full
moral freshness of having just been sworn, as ‘an inhabitant that was
newly come into the parish, and was likely to have a young family.’ The
case was then stated to us by the Coroner, and then we went
down-stairs—led by the plotting Beadle—to view the body. From that day
to this, the poor little figure, on which that sounding legal appellation
was bestowed, has lain in the same place and with the same surroundings,
to my thinking. In a kind of crypt devoted to the warehousing of the
parochial coffins, and in the midst of a perfect Panorama of coffins of
all sizes, it was stretched on a box; the mother had put it in her
box—this box—almost as soon as it was born, and it had been presently
found there. It had been opened, and neatly sewn up, and regarded from
that point of view, it looked like a stuffed creature. It rested on a
clean white cloth, with a surgical instrument or so at hand, and regarded
from that point of view, it looked as if the cloth were ‘laid,’ and the
Giant were coming to dinner. There was nothing repellent about the poor
piece of innocence, and it demanded a mere form of looking at. So, we
looked at an old pauper who was going about among the coffins with a foot
rule, as if he were a case of Self-Measurement; and we looked at one
another; and we said the place was well whitewashed anyhow; and then our
conversational powers as a British Jury flagged, and the foreman said,
‘All right, gentlemen? Back again, Mr. Beadle!’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account