The unconscious : $b The fundamentals of human personality, normal and abnormalPrince, Morton
Science
The unconscious : $b The fundamentals of human personality, normal and abnormal
Prince, Morton
Psychology, Pathological; Subconsciousness
One of these two subjects, while in hypnosis and able to recollect what
goes on in the secondary consciousness, thus describes the coconscious
process during the _spontaneous_ subconscious solution of problems.
“When a problem on which my waking self is engaged remains unsettled, it
is still kept in mind by the secondary consciousness even though put
aside by my waking self. My secondary consciousness often helps me to
solve problems which my waking consciousness has found difficulty in
doing. But it is not my secondary consciousness that accomplishes the
final solution itself, but it helps in the following way: Suppose, for
instance, I am trying to translate a difficult passage in Virgil. I work
at it for some time and am puzzled. Finally, unable to do it, I put it
aside, leaving it unsolved. I decide that it is not worth bothering
about and so put it out of my mind. But it is a mistake to say you put
it _out_ of your mind. What you do is, you put it _into_ your mind; that
is to say, you don’t put it out of your mind if the problem remains
unsolved and unsettled. By putting it _into_ your mind I mean that,
although the waking consciousness may have put it aside, the problem
still remains in the secondary consciousness. In the example I used the
memory of the passage from Virgil would be retained persistently by my
secondary consciousness. Then from time to time a whole lot of
fragmentary memories and thoughts connected with the passage would arise
in this consciousness. Some of these thoughts, perhaps, would be
memories of the rules of grammar, or different meanings of words in the
passage, in fact, anything I had read, or thought, or experienced in
connection with the problem. These would not be logical, connected
thoughts, and they would not solve the problem. My secondary
consciousness does not actually do this, i.e., in the example taken,
translate the passage. The translation is not effected here. But later
when my waking consciousness thinks of the problem again, these
fragmentary thoughts of my secondary consciousness arise in my mind, and
with this information I complete the translation. The actual translation
is put together by my waking consciousness.[84] I am not conscious of
the fact that these fragments of knowledge existed previously in my
secondary consciousness. I do not remember a problem ever to have been
solved by the secondary consciousness.[85] It is always solved by the
waking self, although the material for solving it may come from the
secondary. When my waking consciousness solves it in this way, the
solution seems to come in a miraculous sort of way, sometimes as if it
came to me from somewhere else than my own mind. I have sometimes
thought, in consequence, that I had solved it in my sleep.”[86]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account