American fiction -- 20th century; Divorce -- Fiction; Married people -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
she dared not trust him; he had no right to either. She could not, she
would not let either go.
When the morning came she was more firmly of the same opinion, and she
composed this reply to her husband:
Emil:
I have your letter and my heart is filled with sorrow. I cannot
compel you to live with me against your will. God knows I have
tried to be a loving, dutiful, and sympathetic wife, but it seems I
have failed to please you. It is true that our ideas of how to
live and what is right are very different. I have been aware of
that in my secret soul, but for your sake I did my best to adopt
your point of view. Now I shall be free to follow my own. Since
you no longer love me, I am not sorry that we are to live apart,
for I can see now that I have suffered much on your account. But I
do not choose to reproach you. What good would it do? Besides you
are the father of my children--poor little things. I do not think
that I should have written to you at all if it were not for the
question what is to become of them.
I am trying to do what is best for them and to be just; just to you
and to myself. I have decided to keep both the children. They are
babies still, and need a mother's love. A father's too, but it
seems they cannot have both. Let God judge between us, Emil. They
are my flesh and blood too, and it is you who are forsaking us, not
we you. As you say, I have my health and we shall not starve. I
am not afraid. There is nothing more to say, is there? It has all
been a dreadful mistake--and we thought we should be so happy.
Good-by. In spite of everything I shall always think of you kindly.
CONSTANCE.
Having despatched this she felt as though she would be glad to die.
Life seemed so flat, and her condition so humiliating. Her love for
Emil was dead; the union of their souls was broken; what was there to
look forward to? Yet she knew that she must not stop to repine or to
indulge in self-pity. The stern necessity of winning bread for her
children confronted her and must be faced at once and resolutely. In
this she must find happiness and fresh inspiration. It was her duty to
close the ears and eyes of her soul to the voices and visions of the
past. Hard work would save her brain from giving way, and hard work
only. What should that work be? What was she to do? In the first
glow of her pride, revolting at the slight which her husband had put
upon her, the way had seemed easy, but viewed in the sober light of
reality it bristled with difficulties. Yet now, as she pondered and
realized what failure would mean, her spirit rose to meet them, and
immediate needs forced sorrow to the background.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account