Rich people -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- Fiction
She released her hand and sat staring down at the rug at her feet. It
was a Senna prayer rug, beautiful in coloring and soft as an autumn
twilight in the tones, but she was looking back into the past--its lost
opportunities and forsaken shrines....
Presently her glance shifted to Lorraine--and lingered, speculatively,
appraisingly, as though casting up the balances. It swept him slowly
from head to foot, pausing long upon his face--so long, indeed, that he
shifted uneasily and smiled in self defence.
"Will you do it, Stephanie, dear?" he repeated.
She slowly shook her head.
"I cannot," she answered.
"Why can't you, dear?" he asked.
"Because I do not love you!"
"What has that to do with the question?" he replied. "Neither do I know
that I love you--we must try----"
"I know," she interrupted; "you don't love me--and love is the one
thing that could heal the wounds the past two years have made--for us
both."
"Do you love that scoundrel Amherst?" he asked.
"I do not," was the calm answer--"and you have termed him rightly--he
_is_ a scoundrel."
"Do you love any other man?"
"I do not!" looking him straight in the face.
"Then let us try it, Stephanie," he said.
But she shook her head again.
"It is not just to you----"
"Let me be the judge of that," he cut in.
"Neither is it just to me," she ended. "You will take me back for
the sake of appearances. You think to save me and yourself some
temporary unpleasantness by obviating a divorce--by preventing scare
headlines in the papers. You don't see that you would be making
untold unpleasantness for us both through the remainder of our lives.
When we are apart and need only the Court's severing decree, why
should we assume a life of wretchedness for both? I bear the heavier
burden now. I am content to bear it for a little while--until the
world has forgotten--rather than to purchase that forgetfulness by
a reconciliation which would be only in name--and scarcely in name,
indeed."
"Why should it be only in name?" he asked, leaning toward her. "It
won't be with me, dear."
"You are very good to say so," she replied--"but you'll think
differently in a month--in a week possibly. Amherst will be ever
between us--you will always see him; and as time passes you will see
him only the more. Nothing we can do will remove him--he will be
persistently present--you can't see me without thinking of him--and
of what I did with him. And that can have only one result--renewed
unhappiness for us both, and eventually the final break. Therefore why
not let the break be now--when it is anticipated by every one and is so
much easier for us both?"
She might have added--what was in her mind--that with a man of
strong and resolute purpose the experiment would not be so hazardous
of success; but with one of his character the issue was not even
doubtful--it would be decided before it was begun.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account