The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
History
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]
Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
American loyalists; United Empire loyalists
In defence of the Loyalists, two considerations may be urged. In the
first place, it must be remembered that they were men who had been
evicted from their homes, and whose property had been confiscated. They
had been placed under the ban of the law: the payment of their debts had
been denied them; and they had been forbidden to return to their native
land under penalty of death without benefit of clergy. They had been
imprisoned, fined, subjected to special taxation; their families had been
maltreated, and were in many cases still in the hands of their enemies.
They would have been hardly human had they waged a mimic warfare. In the
second place, their depredations were of great value from a military
point of view. Not only did they prevent thousands of militiamen from
joining the Continental army, but they seriously threatened the sources
of Washington’s food supply. The valleys which they ravaged were the
granary of the revolutionary forces. In 1780 Sir John Johnson destroyed
in the Schoharie valley alone no less than eighty thousand bushels of
grain; and this loss, as Washington wrote to the president of Congress,
‘threatened alarming consequences.’ That this work of destruction was
agreeable to the Loyalists cannot be doubted; but this fact does not
diminish its value as a military measure.
CHAPTER V
PEACE WITHOUT HONOUR
The war was brought to a virtual termination by the surrender of
Cornwallis at Yorktown on October 19, 1781. The definitive articles of
peace were signed at Versailles on September 3, 1783. During the two
years that intervened between these events, the lot of the Loyalists was
one of gloomy uncertainty. They found it hard to believe that the British
government would abandon them to the mercy of their enemies; and yet
the temper of the revolutionists toward them continued such that there
seemed little hope of concession or conciliation. Success had not taught
the rebels the grace of forgiveness. At the capitulation of Yorktown,
Washington had refused to treat with the Loyalists in Cornwallis’s army
on the same terms as with the British regulars; and Cornwallis had been
compelled to smuggle his Loyalist levies out of Yorktown on the ship that
carried the news of his surrender to New York. As late as 1782 fresh
confiscation laws had been passed in Georgia and the Carolinas; and in
New York a law had been passed cancelling all debts due to Loyalists, on
condition that one-fortieth of the debt was paid into the state treasury.
These were straws which showed the way the wind was blowing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account