The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
History
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]
Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
American loyalists; United Empire loyalists
If the terms of the peace had been observed, the plight of the Loyalists
would have been bad enough. But as it was, the outcome proved even
worse. Every clause in the treaty relating to the Loyalists was broken
over and over again. There was no sign of an abatement of the popular
feeling against them; indeed, in some places, the spirit of persecution
seemed to blaze out anew. One of Washington’s bitterest sayings was
uttered at this time, when he said of the Loyalists that ‘he could see
nothing better for them than to commit suicide.’ Loyalist creditors
found it impossible to recover their debts in America, while they were
themselves sued in the British courts by their American creditors, and
their property was still being confiscated by the American legislatures.
The legislature of New York publicly declined to reverse its policy
of confiscation, on the ground that Great Britain had offered no
compensation for the property which her friends had destroyed. Loyalists
who ventured to return home under the treaty of peace were insulted,
tarred and feathered, whipped, and even ham-strung. All over the country
there were formed local committees or associations with the object of
preventing renewed intercourse with the Loyalists and the restitution
of Loyalist property. ‘The proceedings of these people,’ wrote Sir Guy
Carleton, ‘are not to be attributed to politics alone—it serves as a
pretence, and under that cloak they act more boldly, but avarice and a
desire of rapine are the great incentives.’
The Loyalists were even denied civil rights in most of the states. In
1784 an act was passed in New York declaring that all who had held
office under the British, or helped to fit out vessels of war, or who had
served as privates or officers in the British Army, or who had left the
state, were guilty of ‘misprision of treason,’ and were disqualified from
both the franchise and public office. There was in fact hardly a state in
1785 where the Loyalist was allowed to vote. In New York Loyalist lawyers
were not allowed to practise until April 1786, and then only on condition
of taking an ‘oath of abjuration and allegiance.’ In the same state,
Loyalists were subjected to such invidious special taxation that in 1785
one of them confessed that ‘those in New York whose estates have not been
confiscated are so loaded with taxes and other grievances that there is
nothing left but to sell out and move into the protection of the British
government.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account