The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
History
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]
Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
American loyalists; United Empire loyalists
All summer and autumn the ships kept plying to and fro. In June the
‘summer fleet’ brought about 2500 colonists to St John River, Annapolis,
Port Roseway, and Fort Cumberland. By August 23 John Parr, the governor
of Nova Scotia, wrote that ‘upward of 12,000 souls have already arrived
from New York,’ and that as many more were expected. By the end of
September he estimated that 18,000 had arrived, and stated that 10,000
more were still to come. By the end of the year he computed the total
immigration to have amounted to 30,000. As late as January 15, 1784,
the refugees were still arriving. On that date Governor Parr wrote to
Lord North announcing the arrival of ‘a considerable number of Refugee
families, who must be provided for in and about the town at extraordinary
expence, as at this season of the year I cannot send them into the
country.’ ‘I cannot,’ he added, ‘better describe the wretched condition
of these people than by inclosing your lordship a list of those just
arrived in the Clinton transport, destitute of almost everything, chiefly
women and children, all still on board, as I have not yet been able to
find any sort of place for them, and the cold setting in severe.’ There
is a tradition in Halifax that the cabooses had to be taken off the
ships, and ranged along the principal street, in order to shelter these
unfortunates during the winter.
New York was evacuated by the British troops on November 25, 1783. Sir
Guy Carleton did not withdraw from the city until he was satisfied that
every person who desired the protection of the British flag was embarked
on the boats. During the latter half of the year Carleton was repeatedly
requested by Congress to fix some precise limit to his occupation of New
York. He replied briefly, but courteously, that he was doing the best he
could, and that no man could do more. When Congress objected that the
Loyalists were not included in the agreement with regard to evacuation,
Carleton replied that he held opposite views; and that in any case it was
a point of honour with him that no troops should embark until the last
person who claimed his protection should be safely on board a British
ship. As time went on, his replies to Congress grew shorter and more
incisive. On being requested to name an outside date for the evacuation
of the city, he declared that he could not even guess when the last ship
would be loaded, but that he was resolved to remain until it was. He
pointed out, moreover, that the more the uncontrolled violence of their
citizens drove refugees to his protection, the longer would evacuation
be delayed. ‘I should show,’ he said, ‘an indifference to the feelings
of humanity, as well as to the honour and interest of the nation whom
I serve, to leave any of the Loyalists that are desirous to quit the
country, a prey to the violence they conceive they have so much cause to
apprehend.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account