The Universal KinshipMoore, J. Howard (John Howard)
Philosophy
The Universal Kinship
Moore, J. Howard (John Howard)
Evolution; Human beings; Sociology
A large part of the life of the earth has remained steadfastly where
it was cradled, beneath the waves. But more restless portions have
left the sea and crept forth upon the land, or swarmed into the air.
One migration, the most numerous, is represented by the insects.
Another, the most enterprising, was the amphibian. After ages of
evolution the amphibian branch divided. One branch acquired wings
and sailed off into the air. The other divided and subdivided. One
of these subdivisions entered the forests, climbed and clambered
among the trees, acquired perpendicularity and hands, descended and
walked upon the soil, invented agriculture, built cities and states,
and imagined itself immortal. Human society is but the van—the
hither terminus—of an evolutional process which had its beginning
away back in the protoplasm of primeval waters. There is not a form
that creeps beneath the sea but can claim kinship with the eagle.
The philosopher is the remote posterity of the meek and lowly amoeba.
1. See ‘Genealogy of Animals,’ at the end of the chapter.
2. See table of geological ages, at the end of the previous chapter.
XI. Conclusion.
The resemblances, homologies, and metamorphoses existing everywhere
among animal forms are, therefore, evidence of the most logical
consanguinities. It is all so perfectly plain. The structures of
organic beings have come about as a result of the action and
reaction of environment upon these structures. Every being—and not
only every being, but every species, the whole organic world—has
come to be what it is as a result of the incessant hammerings of its
surroundings, the hammerings not only of the present, but of the
long-stretching past. By surroundings is meant, of course, the rest
of the universe. Those animals belonging to the same stock resemble
each other because they have been subjected to the same experiences,
the same series of selections. They have lain on the same great
anvil, and felt the down-comings of the same sledge. The
similarities among animal forms in general indicate relationships,
just as the similarities among the races of men indicate racial
consanguinities. All men belong to the human species because they
are all fundamentally alike. But there are differences in the
character of the hair, in the colour of the skin, in the
conformation of the skull, and in the structure of the language,
among the different varieties of the species, indicating striking
variety in relationship and origin. An eminent biologist has said
that if Negroes and Caucasians were snails they would be classed as
entirely distinct species of animals. Whether, as is thought by
some, the woolly-haired races are the descendants of the African
anthropoids, and the straight-haired varieties are the posterity of
the orangs and gibbons, we may never know positively. But we do know
that these two great branches of mankind must have different
genealogies, extending to a remote antiquity, and that the varieties
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account