to which a sixth generation must be added if the stars of the
sub-system happen to fission further, as, for instance, they have done
in the star shewn in fig. 13. The genealogy of the stars begins with a
vast tenuous nebula filling all space; the last generation consists of
small, shrunken, dying stars with no capacity for further subdivision.
The genealogy has been traced out primarily on theoretical grounds
alone, but we need have no doubts as to its general accuracy, since
observation confirms it repeatedly and at almost every step. Indeed it
is hardly too much to say that the evolutionary sequence could have
been discovered almost equally well from observational evidence alone,
except for the hypothetical primaeval chaos, about which, from the
nature of the case, observation cannot have anything to say.
THE ORIGIN OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Almost all observed astronomical formations can be placed in the
evolutionary sequence we have just discussed, either with fair
certainty or with reasonable plausibility, except for one outstanding
and conspicuous exception—the Solar System. Cosmogony came into
being as an attempt to discover the origin of the solar system. The
reasons why it limited its efforts to this particular problem are
chronological; in the early days of cosmogony, astronomy was barely
conscious of anything outside the solar system. The sketch just given
of the findings of modern scientific cosmogony has been remarkable
in that it has exhibited cosmogony taking us a tour round the whole
universe, explaining the origin and life-history of practically every
object we encounter on this tour, and then becoming speechless when
it is brought back home and confronted with its birthplace, the solar
system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account