LAPLACE’S NEBULAR HYPOTHESIS. The first serious scientific cosmogony
was that embodied in the famous Nebular Hypothesis of Laplace. In 1755
Kant had pictured a primaeval chaos condensing into spinning nebulae,
and, identifying one of these nebulae with the sun, had imagined the
planets to be formed by the solidification of masses of gas shed from
the nebula, much in the way in which we have supposed the stars to be
born. In 1796, Laplace advanced similar ideas, which he developed
in detail with a mathematical precision quite beyond the capacities
of Kant. He shewed how, as its shrinkage made it spin ever faster
and faster, a rotating mass of gas would flatten out, develop the
lenticular form we have already discussed (fig. 3 of Plate XVI), and
then proceed to eject matter in its equatorial plane, or rather to
leave it behind as the shrinkage of the main mass continued. At this
stage it would look somewhat like the nebulae shewn in figs. 4 and 5
of Plate XVI, although Laplace, being unacquainted with nebulae of
this type, adduced Saturn surrounded by its rings as an example of the
formation to be expected at this stage (Plate XXIV, p. 250). Laplace
imagined that the fringe of abandoned gas would then condense and
form a single planet. As the main mass shrunk further, more gas was
abandoned in the equatorial plane, which in due course condensed into
another planet, and so on, until the sun left off shrinking and no
more planets were born. A repetition of the same process, but on a far
smaller scale, resulted in the satellites being born out of the planets.
That the hypothesis is _prima facie_ plausible, is evident from its
having survived, and indeed been generally accepted, for nearly
a century before it encountered any serious opposition. Recently
criticisms have accumulated, of so vital a nature as to make it clear
that the hypothesis must be abandoned.
The sun, according to Laplace, broke up and gave birth to planets
through excess of rotation. Yet both theory and observation indicate
quite clearly the fate in store for a star which rotates too fast
for safety; it does not found a family, but merely bursts, like an
overdriven fly-wheel, into parts of nearly equal size. Spectroscopic
binary and multiple systems are the relics of stars which have broken
up through excess of rotation, and they do not in the least resemble
the solar system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account