Sir William Herschel believed he had confirmed his own view of the
structure of the galactic system in the same way, by discovering
similar systems, of which he could obtain a bird’s-eye view because
they were entirely extraneous to the galaxy. He spoke of these objects
as “island universes” and believed them to be clouds of stars. They
were of hazy nebular appearance, and although it was impossible to
distinguish the separate stars in them, he believed that sufficient
telescopic power would make this possible, just as it had enabled
Galileo to see the separate stars in the Milky Way. These objects,
which we shall describe almost immediately, are generally known as
“extra-galactic nebulae“ from their position, although we shall
frequently find it convenient to use the briefer term “great nebulae,”
to which their immense size fully entitles them.
NEBULAE
A telescope exhibits a planet as a disc of appreciable size, and an
eye-piece which magnifies 60 times will make Jupiter look as large as
the moon. Yet an eye-piece which magnifies 60 times, or any greater
number of times, can never make a star look as large as the moon. No
magnification within our command causes any star to appear as anything
other than a mere point of light. The stars are of course enormously
larger than Jupiter, but they are also enormously more distant, and it
is the distance that wins.
[Illustration: PLATE II N.G.C. 2022 N.G.C. 6720 N.G.C. 1501 N.G.C. 7662
_Mt Wilson Observatory_ Planetary Nebulae]
[Illustration: PLATE III _Mt Wilson Observatory_ The Nebula in Cygnus]
The telescope nevertheless shews a number of objects which appear
bigger than mere points of light. They are generally of a faint,
hazy appearance, and so have received the general name of “nebulae.”
Detailed investigation has shewn that these fall into three distinct
classes.
PLANETARY NEBULAE. The first class are generally described as
“Planetary Nebulae.” There is nothing of a planetary nature about them
beyond the fact that, like the planets, they shew as finite discs in
a telescope. A few hundreds only of these objects are known, four
typical examples being illustrated in Plate II. They all lie within
the galactic system. We shall discuss their physical structure below
(p. 321). For the moment, it is enough to say that they are probably
of the nature of stars which have in some way become surrounded by
luminous atmospheres of enormous extent. If so they of course disprove
our general statement that no star ever appears as anything but a point
of light in a telescope; we must make an exception in favour of the
planetary nebulae.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account