We have mentioned Hubble’s estimate that matter is distributed in space
at an average rate of 1·5 × 10⁻³¹ grammes per cubic centimetre. The
annihilation of a gramme of matter liberates 9 × 10²⁰ ergs of energy,
so that the annihilation of 1·5 × 10⁻³¹ grammes of matter liberates
1·35 × 10⁻¹⁰ ergs of energy. It follows that the total annihilation
of all the substance of the existing universe would only fill space
with energy at the rate of 1·35 × 10⁻¹⁰ ergs per cubic centimetre.
This amount of energy is only enough to raise the temperature of space
from absolute zero to a temperature far below that of liquid air; it
would only raise the temperature of the earth’s surface by a 6000th
part of a degree Centigrade. The reason why the effect of annihilating
a whole universe is so extraordinarily slight is of course that
space is so extraordinarily empty of matter; trying to warm space by
annihilating all the matter in it is like trying to warm a room by
burning a speck of dust here and a speck of dust there. As compared
with any amount of radiation that is ever likely to be poured into it,
the capacity of space is that of a bottomless pit. Indeed, so far as
scientific observation goes, it is entirely possible that the radiation
of thousands of dead universes may even now be wandering round space
without our suspecting it.
Such is the final end of things to which, so far as present-day science
can see, the material universe must inevitably come in some far-off
age, unless the course of nature is changed in the meantime. Let us now
try to peer back towards the beginnings of things.
THE BEGINNINGS OF THE UNIVERSE
As we go forwards in time, material weight continually changes into
radiation. Conversely, as we go backwards in time, the total material
weight of the universe must continually increase. We have seen how the
present weights of the stars are incompatible with their having existed
for more than some 5 or 10 million million years, and that they would
need approximately the whole of this enormous period to acquire certain
signs of age which their present arrangement and motions reveal.
We have seen that the break-up of the huge extra-galactic nebulae must
result in the birth of stars, and have found that the most consistent
account of the origin of the galactic system of stars is provided by
the supposition that the whole system originated out of the break-up of
a single huge nebula some 5 to 10 million million years ago.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account