Let us pause for a moment to compare this with an alternative
hypothesis, which some astronomers have favoured, that stars are being
created all the time. On this hypothesis we picture the stars as
passing in an endless steady stream from creation to extinction, just
as men pass in an endless steady stream from their cradles to their
graves, a new generation always coming into being to step into the
place vacated by the old. On this view Plaskett’s star, with about a
hundred times the weight of the sun, must be a recent creation, while
Kruger 60, with only a fraction of the sun’s weight, would be very,
very old—perhaps 100 million million years older than Plaskett’s star.
At present direct observation cannot definitely decide between the two
conflicting hypotheses, but it rather frowns upon the “steady stream”
view of the stars. In a steady population the number of people in
any assigned condition is exactly proportional to the time taken to
pass through that condition. Suppose for instance that human beings
possess infant teeth for a quarter as long as they possess adult teeth.
If examination of the teeth of a population shewed that four times
as many had adult teeth as infant teeth, this would create a _prima
facie_ expectation that we were dealing with a steady population. If,
on the contrary, 100 times as many people were found with adult teeth
as with infant teeth, we should know we were not dealing with a steady
population. If other evidence pointed to the population all being of
approximately the same age, we should be inclined to accept this and
regard the 1 per cent. of cases of infant teeth as cases of arrested
development.
We do not judge the ages of stars by their teeth but by their weights
and luminosities. And the luminosities of the stars are not found
to conform to the statistical laws which would prevail in a steady
population of stars. There appear to be so many middle-aged stars and
so few infants and veterans as to make the hypothesis of a steady
continuous creation hardly tenable. Indeed there is rather distinct
evidence of a special creation of stars at about the time our sun
was born. This leads back again quite naturally to the view that the
galactic system was born out of a spiral nebula whose main activity as
a parent of stars occurred some 5 to 10 million million years ago.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account